Evidence mapPaperPMID 40396261Full record

Trial reportHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Improving Diversity in Recruitment: Lessons Learned During the REACH Pregnancy Circles Pilot Trial.

Octavia Wiseman, Sidera Tahir, Christine McCourt, Anita Mehay, Helliner Robinson, Kade Mondeh, Lorna Sweeney, Meg Wiggins, Mary Sawtell, Angela Harden and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Octavia WisemanCity St George's, University of London, Centre for Maternal and Child Health, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4890-9435
Sidera TahirCity St George's, University of London, Centre for Maternal and Child Health, London, UK.
Christine McCourtCity St George's, University of London, Centre for Maternal and Child Health, London, UK.
Anita MehayUniversity of East London, The Institute of Health and Human Development (IHHD), Water Lane London, UK.
Helliner RobinsonBarts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London, UK.
Kade MondehBarts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London, UK.
Lorna SweeneyUniversity of East London, The Institute of Health and Human Development (IHHD), Water Lane London, UK.
Meg WigginsInstitute of Education, University College London, London, UK.
Mary SawtellInstitute of Education, University College London, London, UK.
Angela HardenUniversity of East London, The Institute of Health and Human Development (IHHD), Water Lane London, UK.
REACH Research Team

Funding

This study was supported by National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research (PGfAR) Programme (Grant Reference Number RP-PG-1211-20015).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOur ability to address inequities in health outcomes is hampered by the under-representation of underserved groups in research. Research exploring this topic has focused on observational studies in the American context. This is a pivotal concern for maternity research in the UK as perinatal outcome variables vary by ethnicity, socioeconomic and linguistic background. This paper reports the findings of an analysis of the diversity achieved by different recruitment strategies used within a feasibility study and pilot trial of group antenatal care (Pregnancy Circles).

methodA pilot randomised controlled trial involved implementation of Pregnancy Circles across three maternity services in an area of high ethnic, socioeconomic and linguistic diversity. Following findings of high ethnic diversity but low levels of educational and linguistic diversity amongst participants recruited in our prior feasibility study, equity-informed strategies were put into place to attempt to increase recruitment diversity in the pilot trial, addressing organisational barriers (additional language support); attitudinal barriers (staff training to counteract recruitment bias) and practical barriers (extending the recruitment period to reach women accessing care late). Women who declined participation were invited to complete a short anonymous questionnaire covering demographic details and reasons for declining. The demographic characteristics of participants in the feasibility and pilot studies, and the pilot study decliners, were compared using descriptive statistics and free-text reasons for declining were analysed thematically.

resultsThe targeted recruitment processes were successful in widening the diversity of participants in this study, in particular for women with limited English proficiency and low educational achievement. Nevertheless, comparison of participants to those who declined showed some barriers persisted. The most common reason to decline was lack of time, most commonly due to caring responsibilities, and this was more likely to be cited by ethnically minoritized women.

conclusionRecruitment plans focused on widening diversity can be effective but are likely to require additional resources such as funding longer recruitment periods or interpreting services. The gendered nature of maternity research poses particular challenges, and our study suggests that addressing barriers such as those around childcare would enhance the recruitment of socio-economically deprived and minoritized women. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Our study team included two service user representatives as co-investigators, feeding into all aspects of the study. The focus of the work reported here was to increase the participation of underserved communities in the pilot trial and to inform the Pregnancy Circles RCT, to enable them to contribute their data and lived experience to the findings and evaluation of this intervention.

trial registrationDue to an administrative oversight, trial registration for this pilot trial was applied for during the 6-week recruitment period, rather than before recruitment commencing (ISRCTN66925258. Retrospectively registered 3 April 2017). Registration occurred before programme intervention, outcomes and process data collection and all data analysis.

Indexed as

Cultural DiversityPatient SelectionPrenatal CareAdultEthnicityFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansPilot ProjectsPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdomgroup antenatal carematernitymigrationpatient involvementrecruitmentreduced inequalitiesresearch participation

Identifiers

PMID40396261
PMCPMC12093102

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.