Evidence mapPaperPMID 40396990Full record

ArticleMedical care2025

Developing and Validating Models to Predict Suboptimal Early Glycemic Control Among Individuals With Younger Onset Type 2 Diabetes.

Anjali Gopalan, Christine A Board, Stacey E Alexeeff, Joshua R Nugent, Pranita Mishra, Andrew J Karter, Richard W Grant

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anjali GopalanKaiser Permanente Northern California, Division of Research, Pleasanton, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-9300-1154
Christine A Board
Stacey E Alexeeff
Joshua R Nugent
Pranita Mishra
Andrew J Karter
Richard W Grant

Funding

Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alyce Sophia Adams, HILARY Kessler SELIGMAN · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
The initial care of younger adults with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetesK23DK116968 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GOPALAN, ANJALI · 2018 to 2022
$1.0M
A pilot trial of an intervention to support initial type 2 diabetes selfmanagement among younger adults with children.R01DK139225 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Anjali Gopalan · 2025 to 2026
$649k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK116968NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK139225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveYounger age at the time of type 2 diabetes onset increases individuals' future complication risk. Proactively identifying younger-onset individuals at increased risk of not achieving early glycemic goals can support targeted initial care. DESIGN AND

methodsIndividuals (ages 21-44) newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes were identified and randomly assigned to training (70%) and validation (30%) datasets. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression models were specified to identify key predictors (assessed at diagnosis) of suboptimal glycemic control (HbA1c≥8%) within 1 year after diagnosis using the training dataset. The full model included 48 candidate predictors. We also developed additional more streamlined models using more widely available predictors (transferable model), a smaller number of available predictors (simplified transferable model), and a bivariate model with HbA1c as the sole predictor (HbA1c-only model). Model-based predicted risk scores were used to stratify individuals in the validation dataset.

resultsThe cohort included 10,879 individuals. All of the models, including the HbA1c-only model, performed comparably. All had good discrimination (C-statistics ranging from 0.71 to 0.73) in the validation dataset.

conclusionsWhen predicting the risk of not achieving glycemic goals, the HbA1c-only model had comparable performance to the more complex prediction models. This simple risk stratification requires no computation and could be implemented simply by looking at the diagnosis HbA1c value. This practical approach can be used to identify newly diagnosed younger adults who may need extra attention during the critical early period after diagnosis.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glycemic ControlAdultAge of OnsetBlood GlucoseFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsYoung AdultBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobindiabeteshealth care deliverypredictive analyticsrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID40396990
PMCPMC12621628

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.