ReviewEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy2025
Management of dyslipidaemia in patients with comorbidities-facing the challenge: type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Review in European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Management of dyslipidaemia in patients with comorbidities: facing the challenge: type 2 diabetes mellitus.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Type 1 diabetes is associated with excess cardiovascular risk. In contrast to type 2 diabetes, however, age at the onset of type 1 diabetes and sex are major predictors of cardiovascular risk, while the role of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and lipid-lowering therapy is less clear. Since most data on the effects of lipid-lowering treatments are obtained from randomized clinical trials that included very predominantly patients with type 2 diabetes, it is almost impossible to specifically discern endpoints in type 1 diabetes. Inversely, most data specific for type 1 diabetes are obtained from real world findings. Consequently, the evidence on efficacy and safety of lipid-lowering therapies available from randomized clinical trials arises very predominantly from type 2 diabetes. Thus, this specific review summarizes the evidence of lipid-lowering drug classes in reducing cardiovascular risk in patients with type 1 diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.