Trial reportClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2025
Plasma chemokines indicate enhanced bleeding in patients with chronic coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary stenting.
Trial report in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Routine Troponin I Assessment Enhances Risk Stratification in Hospitalized Patients with Seasonal Influenza.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Pre-interventional transesophageal echocardiography as a reliable predictor of residual shunt following patent foramen ovale closure.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- Receptor-Dependent and -Independent Effects of Hemin on Platelet Plasma Membrane Disintegration.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with coronary artery disease (CAD) are at increased risk of developing ischemic events and contemporary antiplatelet therapy often leads to bleeding events following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Glycoprotein VI (GPVI) is the key receptor of collagen-dependent thrombus formation and crucial for platelet homeostasis.
methodsWe analysed the influence of GPVI inhibition with revacept in a randomized double-blinded trial enrolling 334 patients with CAD undergoing elective PCI. Ex vivo platelet function analyses were assessed alongside plasma chemokine concentrations. We then elucidate changes of GPVI-dependent chemokine concentrations in patients with bleeding events during the 30-day clinical follow-up.
resultsChanges in platelet function occur in patients with revacept treatment and are associated with a characteristic alteration of circulating chemokine concentrations. Further, patients with adverse bleeding events share a distinct fingerprint of chemokines that is associated with modulation of in vitro platelet functions. In addition, assessment of GPVI-associated changes in chemokine signalling and platelet functions demonstrated an increased diagnostic value in patients with CAD and might improve early risk discrimination for bleeding events.
conclusionThe composition of platelet-derived chemokines correlated with platelet functions following antiplatelet treatment. Thus, assessment of chemokines may offer the perspective to identify patients at increased risk for bleeding events. Likewise, modulation of platelet chemokines in patients with revacept treatment contributes to the efficacy of antiplatelet treatment and might attenuate pathophysiological cascades leading to haemorrhagic diathesis in patients with CAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.