ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Molecular mechanisms of arecoline-induced oral cancer: a network toxicology and molecular docking techniques integrated analysis.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Targeted Neuroprotection byInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Molecular effects of areca nut-derived compounds on human oral cancer cells: a systematic review of in vitro evidence.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The IARC classified betel nut as Group 1 carcinogen (2004) and arecoline as Group 2B carcinogen (2020), with approximately one-third of global oral cancer cases attributed to smokeless tobacco or betel nut consumption. While current evidence establishes an association between arecoline and oral cancer, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain complex and poorly elucidated. This study employs network toxicology integrated with molecular docking techniques to systematically investigate the potential molecular pathogenesis of arecoline-induced oral cancer, aiming to provide novel insights for targeted therapeutic strategies. The SMILES structure of arecoline was retrieved from PubChem for foundational data preparation. Toxicity profiling was conducted using ProTox-3.0 and ADMETlab databases. Potential targets of arecoline were identified via STITCH and SwissTargetPrediction. Oral cancer-related targets were collated from GeneCards, OMIM, and TTD. Intersection analysis between arecoline targets and oral cancer-associated targets was performed to identify shared targets, which were further utilized to construct compound-target regulatory network and subjected to PPI, GO, and KEGG analyses. Core targets driving oral cancer were screened using the cytoHubba plugin. Then, the correlation between core targets and immune cell infiltration in oral cancer was explored, and molecular docking validated the binding affinity of arecoline to core targets. Finally, Gromacs 2022.3 software was used to simulate the molecular dynamics of the complexes obtained by molecular docking for 100 ns. Using the STITCH and SwissTargetPrediction databases, a total of 46 potential targets of arecoline were identified. Concurrently, 2,375 oral cancer-related targets were retrieved from GeneCards, OMIM, and TTD. Intersection analysis of these two target sets yielded 26 overlapping targets. PPI analysis revealed that TP53, IL6, SNAI1, and CASP3 occupied central positions in the network, exhibiting extensive interactions with other target proteins. Enrichment analysis comprehensively elucidated the molecular functions, biological processes, cellular components, and associated pathways of these overlapping targets. Further screening using Cytoscape software identified four core targets: TP53, TNF, IL6, and CASP3. Immune infiltration analysis indicated that the expression levels of TP53, TNF, IL6, and CASP3 in oral cancer tissues were positively correlated with the infiltration levels of immune cells, including CD8 + T cells, Th1 cells, NK cells, and macrophages. Molecular docking experiments demonstrated strong binding activities between arecoline and TP53, IL6, and CASP3, while TNF also exhibited moderate binding affinity. Dynamic simulation further verified the stable binding of arecoline to TP53, TNF, IL6 and CASP3. Arecoline may induce oral cancer by acting on core targets including TP53, TNF, IL6, and CASP3, which interfere with normal cellular growth regulation, inflammatory responses, and apoptotic mechanisms. Therapeutic strategies targeting TP53, TNF, IL6, and CASP3 may represent novel research directions for clinical diagnosis and treatment of oral cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.