Evidence mapPaperPMID 40397378Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2025

Genetic renaissance: a cross-regional analysis of the approval landscape of authorised gene therapeutics in paediatrics, challenges and future prospects.

Aftab Ahmad, Simran Simran, Vaishnavi Milind Kalokhe, Fathima Musthafa, Vishal Sachin Gangawane, Khushboo Khivaram Choudhary, Rajeev Singh Raghuvanshi, Saurabh Srivastava

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aftab Ahmad *Department of Regulatory Affairs, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Balanagar, Hyderabad, 500037, Telangana, India.
Simran Simran *Department of Regulatory Affairs, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Balanagar, Hyderabad, 500037, Telangana, India.
Vaishnavi Milind KalokheDepartment of Regulatory Affairs, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Balanagar, Hyderabad, 500037, Telangana, India.
Fathima MusthafaDepartment of Regulatory Affairs, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Balanagar, Hyderabad, 500037, Telangana, India.
Vishal Sachin GangawaneDepartment of Regulatory Affairs, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Balanagar, Hyderabad, 500037, Telangana, India.
Khushboo Khivaram ChoudharyDepartment of Regulatory Affairs, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Balanagar, Hyderabad, 500037, Telangana, India.
Rajeev Singh RaghuvanshiCentral Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO), Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, Directorate General of Health Services, New Delhi, India.
Saurabh SrivastavaDepartment of Regulatory Affairs, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Balanagar, Hyderabad, 500037, Telangana, India. saurabh@niperhyd.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene therapies are proven to be a milestone in the treatment of genetic disorders, especially in children who bear a disproportionately high burden of rare and hereditary diseases. Clinical evaluation of gene therapy (GT) in paediatrics is a significant challenge for every regulatory body. This study examined the available data on GT products that have been authorised for use by children in Japan, Europe, and the United States. We systematically analysed publicly available regulatory databases from USFDA, EMA, and PMDA to track GT approvals. Therapies were categorized based on their intended patient population (adults, paediatrics, or both), approval trends, and regulatory designations such as Orphan Drug Designation (ODD), Fast Track Designation (FTD), Breakthrough Therapy Designation (BTD), and Rare Paediatric Disease Designation (RPDD). As of April 2024, a total of 75 GTs were approved across these three regions for adults, paediatrics, and both populations combined. 37 in the US, 18 in Europe, and 20 in Japan. Among them, 41 were for adults, 13 for paediatrics, and 21 for both age groups. Of the 13 paediatric approvals the USFDA leads in paediatric GT approvals with 7 therapies, followed by the EMA with 5 (of which 2 were later withdrawn due to commercial reasons), and the PMDA with 1 therapy. Gene therapies hold immense promise for paediatric patients, offering life-changing treatments where few or no options exist. However, high costs, complex clinical trial requirements, and long-term safety concerns continue to limit their widespread adoption. This study underscores the urgent need for global regulatory harmonization and policy initiatives to improve access to paediatric GTs. While regulatory frameworks have enabled faster approvals, sustained efforts are required to ensure affordability, long-term safety, and equitable access for children worldwide.

Indexed as

Committee for advanced therapiesGene therapyOrphanPaediatric designations

Identifiers

PMID40397378
PMCPMC12401787

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.