Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40397788›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2025

Strategies to reduce the cancer burden and improve access to effective and affordable cancer interventions in Europe.

Anton Berns, Ulrik Ringborg, Julio Celis, Bengt Jönsson, Michael Baumann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anton BernsEuropean Academy of Cancer Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2194-1988
Ulrik RingborgEuropean Academy of Cancer Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.
Julio CelisEuropean Academy of Cancer Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.
Bengt JönssonEuropean Academy of Cancer Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0051-7785
Michael BaumannEuropean Academy of Cancer Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9340-974X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of new anticancer treatments, their clinical evaluation and introduction into the healthcare system need improvement. New drugs and cell therapies often come with significant costs for society while only marginally improving patients' survival and health-related quality-of-life. Therefore, bold, innovative clinical trials with critical assessment of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of new preventive measures and medical treatments are needed to ensure that patients and society benefit. Drug development programmes controlled by pharma should be complemented with initiatives such as stop studies, dose reduction, combination and repurposing trials. These should be validated in academia-initiated trials supported by societal funds. Special attention should be devoted to paediatric and rare adult cancers. Comprehensive Cancer Centres (CCCs) covering the entire cancer research continuum, present throughout the EU, are critical for this. More of such centres must be established concomitantly with a robust accreditation methodology to ensure that they meet appropriate quality standards. It is crucial that funding for these initiatives, now temporarily and partially provided by the EU Cancer Mission and Europe's Beating Cancer Plan, is secured for a much longer period.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityNeoplasmsEuropeHumansaffordabilitycomprehensive cancer centreEU Cancer Missionfundinghealth‐related quality of lifePI‐initiated clinical trials

Identifiers

PMID40397788
PMCPMC12161469

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.