ArticlePloS one2025
Self-compassion as a protective factor against adverse consequences of social media use: A scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating the relationship between social media exposure, body image dissatisfaction, and self-compassion in adolescent athlete.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Digital age triggers: the role of social media evaluation in music performance anxiety.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Self-Compassion and Bedtime Procrastination Among Chinese Medical Students: The Serial Mediating Role of Nighttime Media Use.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Self-compassion has been shown to foster wellbeing and act as a protective factor against the development of psychopathology. Its protective capacity against adverse consequences of social media use, however, is not well understood. Given the increasing use of social media in our daily lives, gaining a nuanced understanding of the relationship between self-compassion and adverse consequences of social media use may be important for building and maintaining healthier online behaviors and spaces. We conducted a systematic scoping review of empirical studies on the relationship between social media use, self-compassion, and wellbeing. We restricted our search to peer-reviewed studies published between January 2010 and October 2024 that were written or translated to English. Thirty studies of 32 independent samples including 11,991 participants were eligible for review. Many of these studies were cross-sectional surveys with majority female participants. Studies generally focused on one of two domains: 1) psychological well-being (e.g., anxiety/depression and resilience); and 2) body image and appearance (e.g., appearance dissatisfaction and comparison). The studies included in this review showed mixed results, with four common themes emerging: 1) There are associations between self-compassion and social media in a variety of populations and contexts; 2) Self-compassion may offer protective benefits in the context of social media use, but the extent and mechanisms remain unclear; 3) Self-compassion-oriented interventions may promote favorable health outcomes, with social-media-based approaches emerging as a promising avenue; and 4) Social media use is measured inconsistently, suggesting a standardized measure, while needed, is lacking. This review revealed a promising role for self-compassion in promoting wellbeing and buffering against the adverse effects of social media usage, while highlighting gaps and limitations of existing research. Future research should prioritize improvement in measurement of social media use and explore individual-level risk and resilience factors in the context of social media exposures and engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.