ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2025
Impact of rapid genomic testing on clinical outcomes of acutely unwell children presenting with severe epilepsy.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid genomic sequencing in the NICU: Who to test and why.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Review
- Uncertainty, ethics, and progress in genomic medicine.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
About 30% of epilepsy patients remain unresponsive to standard antiseizure treatment. Increasing evidence suggests that genetic epilepsies may respond better to targeted management. In this study, we therefore evaluate the therapeutic benefits of rapid genetic testing in children with severe epilepsy.
methodsthe clinical data of patients with epilepsy referred for rapid whole-exome sequencing were systematically collected at two large paediatric/neurogenetic centres (Birmingham/Oxford) in the United Kingdom over 3 years (2019-2022), with follow-up at 12 months post-diagnosis. The demographics, diagnostic yield, management by gene function and seizure group (SZ-seizures only or SZ+ seizures with co-morbidities) were explored.
resultsamong the 106 eligible patients, the age at testing ranged from 0 to 16 years with a median of 7 months. Underserved ethnic groups, e.g., British Asians and Black British, were well-represented. Thirty-nine genes affecting 49 patients were identified, giving an overall diagnostic yield of 46%, which was further enhanced to 51% (31/61) in the SZ+ group. Twenty percent of genes identified affect ion channels and patients were more likely to present early (<6 months old) and respond to a gene-directed treatment (p = 0.004483). Seizures secondary to metabolic disorders responded to bespoke therapy. A fifth (22/106) of tested patients and 45% (22/49) of those diagnosed had their management impacted. At the 12-month follow-up, 9/15 (60%) patients remained seizure-free following gene-targeted management.
conclusionthis study demonstrates high diagnostic yield and significant therapeutic benefit from rapid genetic testing in patients with epilepsy. The gene function categories were statistically significant predictors of management change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.