ArticleCell biochemistry and biophysics2025
A Machine Learning Method for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Intracranial Hemorrhage.
Article in Cell biochemistry and biophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in neurovascular surgery: advancing diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a critical and urgent condition in clinical practice. Recent research has highlighted acute kidney injury (AKI) that frequently impacts patient prognosis. For clinicians, early intervention is crucial, and the advancement of machine learning brings promising prospects for predicting this disease. Therefore, this study aims to develop innovative machine learning models for the prediction and diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). AKI data of ICH patients were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. To construct the models, we utilized various techniques including random survival forest (RSF), elastic network (Enet), Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso), stepwise logistic regression (stepwise LR), and ten machine learning algorithms. Optimal parameters were obtained through a ten-fold crossover, and training and testing groups were employed for the integrated machine models' training and validation. We conducted a quantitative evaluation of the model's performance and assessed its clinical application to determine its advantages. Furthermore, we compared the base model with traditional models such as the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and the bespoke Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II model. A total of 1856 patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) were enrolled in the study, consisting of 1633 non-AKI patients and 223 AKI patients. Among the various machine learning models tested, XGBoost exhibited the highest predictive accuracy and demonstrated excellent clinical applicability as a standalone model. When combining integrated models, RSF+XGBoost, LR[forward]+Lasso, LR[forward]+RSF, and Lasso+XGBoost, all achieved the highest AUC values (AUC = 1.000). Machine learning models can serve as valuable diagnostic tools in identifying the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) cases. Whether utilized individually or in combination, these models have the potential to assist clinicians in proactively developing effective interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40399697What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.