ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
Translate and psychometric evaluation of the scale of knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors and lifestyle after coronary event.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoronary heart disease (CHD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The level of self-care after coronary events is closely linked to understanding cardiovascular risk factors and adopting healthier lifestyle behaviors. An appropriate scale can help healthcare providers measure patients' understanding of cardiovascular risk factors and provide educational interventions. This study aimed to translate and conduct a psychometric evaluation of the scale of knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors and lifestyle after coronary events.
methodsA standardized guideline was followed for translating and culturally adapting the English version of the Scale of Knowledge of Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Lifestyle after Coronary Events. The study included 300 patients with CHD aged 23 to 90. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to analyze construct validity. Internal consistency was estimated with Cronbach's alpha (0.98), and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess scale stability (0.84).
resultsA total of 300 patients with an average age of 56.6 ± 12.7 were evaluated. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed construct validity, resulting in a 4-factor model comprising knowledge of cardiovascular risks (7 items), knowledge of lifestyle recommendations (6 items), knowledge of cholesterol and blood pressure control (5 items), and knowledge of diabetes (3 items). Together, these factors explained 67.34% of the total variance. The Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency of the scale was 0.851. Additionally, scale stability, as measured by the test-retest method, was 0.84, which is acceptable according to the minimum value of 0.70.
conclusionThe translated Scale of Knowledge of Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Lifestyle after Coronary Events demonstrated strong psychometric properties among patients with CHD. The scale is both reliable and valid, providing healthcare providers with a practical tool to evaluate patient understanding and guide educational efforts aimed at enhancing post-coronary event self-care. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.