ReviewCardiovascular diabetology2025
Cardiovascular disease in women with type 1 diabetes: a narrative review and insights from a population-based cohort analysis.
Review in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Type 1 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk: The Current Management Strategies.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Characteristics of type 1 diabetes in Northwest China: A multicenter hospital-based study.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2026Article
- Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B targets - a SwissDiab study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Mapping sex-based multimorbidity networks in type 1 diabetes: a real-world study from Shanghai.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Sex differences in arterial stiffness in a rat model of type 1 diabetes.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Sex differences in cardiovascular disease risk in type 1 diabetes: The vascular bed paradox in women.Diabetes & vascular disease researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of mortality among people with type 1 diabetes (T1D), with cardiovascular mortality rates 2-5 times higher than in the general population. A concerning sex disparity exists within this high-risk population, as the cardioprotective advantage typically observed in women without diabetes appears attenuated or eliminated in individuals with T1D. This disparity is evident across the CVD spectrum, including coronary artery disease, stroke, heart failure, and cardiovascular mortality, with women consistently experiencing an excess burden of disease. These differences are particularly pronounced in women with early-onset T1D, leading to a substantial loss of life-years-approximately 18 years for women compared to 14 for men. Several factors may contribute to this sex disparity. First, the effect of hyperglycemia on CVD appears to have a sex-based differential impact and women with T1D often demonstrate more difficulties to achieve optimal glycemic control. Second, although women with T1D generally exhibit a more favorable CVD risk factor profile than men with T1D, the presence of hypertension, smoking or diabetic kidney disease seem to have a strong impact on CVD in women. Diabetes also appears to diminish sex-based differences in lipid metabolism, and a trend towards increased obesity rates among women with T1D has been observed. Lastly, female-specific factors, which are more prevalent in T1D, exacerbate cardiovascular risk. These include premature menopause, pregnancy-related disorders (such as preeclampsia), polycystic ovary syndrome, and autoimmune diseases, which disproportionately affect women. This narrative review examines the epidemiological evidence highlighting the aspects regarding the excess risk of CVD in women with T1D and evaluates sex disparities in both traditional and female-specific risk factors. Finally, we include a sex-based analysis from the Catalan Registry, which highlights the critical need for greater awareness and enhanced early detection and management of CVD risk factors in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.