Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40400255›Full record

SynthesisPsychological medicine2025

The clinical efficacy of psychological interventions for bipolar depression: a systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis.

Sakir Yilmaz, Anna Huguet, Steve Kisely, Sanjay Rao, JianLi Wang, Molly Price, Richard Morriss, Maree Inder, Tania Perich, Kim Wright

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychological medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sakir YilmazDepartment of Psychology, Abdullah Gul University.ORCID 0000-0003-1896-1742
Anna HuguetVirgili Departament de Psicologia, Universitat Rovira I.
Steve KiselyDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology, and of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University.
Sanjay RaoDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology, and of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University.
JianLi WangDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology, and of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University.
Molly PriceUniversity of Cardiff.
Richard MorrissSchool of Medicine, Unit of Mental Health and Neuroscience, University of Nottingham.
Maree InderDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago.
Tania PerichSchool of Psychology, Western Sydney University.
Kim WrightDepartment of Psychology, University of Exeter.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlike conventional meta-analyses, individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis assesses moderator variables at the level of each participant, which generates more precise and biased estimates. The objective of this study was to investigate whether psychological therapy reduces depression symptoms in people with Bipolar I and II disorders and examine whether baseline depression has a moderating effect on treatment outcomes. Through the use of several electronic databases, a systematic search was conducted. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials evaluating a psychological intervention for adults diagnosed with Bipolar I or II disorder. Titles and abstracts were screened, followed by full texts. The authors of the included studies were asked to provide IPD from their trials. A multilevel model approach was used to analyze the data. From the 7552 studies found by our searches, six studies with 668 study participants were eligible. Intervention significantly reduced depression scores. There was a significant association between baseline depression and post treatment depression scores. There was no statistically significant interaction between condition allocation and baseline depression score. When IPD from the two most comparable studies were analyzed, CBT had reduced depression scores relative to the comparator condition. The study included patient data from only six studies which were heterogeneous in terms of intervention type, outcome measure, and comparators. Overall, the psychological interventions tested significantly reduced bipolar depression scores. There was no evidence of moderation by baseline depression scores.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderCognitive Behavioral TherapyPsychosocial InterventionHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeBipolar depressionindividual patient data meta-analysispsychological interventions

Identifiers

PMID40400255
PMCPMC12115277

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.