Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40400327›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuromuscular diseases2025

Altered reversal and extinction learning in the DMSXL mouse model of type I myotonic dystrophy (DM1): An exploratory study.

Sylvia Nieuwenhuis, Denys Kozakov, Kasia Kapusta, Geneviève Gourdon, Jeffrey C Glennon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sylvia NieuwenhuisDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8254-7445
Denys KozakovDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Kasia KapustaDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Geneviève GourdonSorbonne Université, Inserm, Association Institut de Myologie, Centre de recherche en Myologie, Paris, France.
Jeffrey C GlennonDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2371-0422

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundCognitive changes in type 1 myotonic dystrophy (DM1) have a pronounced negative effect on quality of life measures. Despite this, the neural basis of these changes is poorly understood. DM1 patients demonstrate deficits in motivation and cognitive flexibility, reflective of apathy and obsessive-compulsive / autistic-like traits.ObjectiveThese traits can be readily assessed using reversal learning and appetitive extinction tasks. Reversal learning assesses the ability to learn following a change in a rule and can evaluate cognitive flexibility and habitual responding, while appetitive extinction assesses the ability to suppress a stimulus-action response following the change in the stimulus-reward relationship from rewarded to non-rewarded.MethodsIn this study we evaluated the performance of a mouse model of DM1, the DMSXL mouse in reversal learning and appetitive extinction tasks.ResultsSimilar to C57/BL6 wild type (WT) mice, DMSXL mice were able to learn stimulus reward relationships, however, in the late phase of reversal learning experiment DMSXL mice demonstrated increased habit-like behavior (increased number of correct responses). Following rule switching, DMSXL mice produced an increased number of errors compared to WT and showed increased latency to deliver correct responses. In the extinction task, DMSXL mice showed the ability to more rapidly extinguish a previously rewarded response than WT mice.ConclusionsThese findings constitute differences in cognitive flexibility, rule learning and motivation between DMSXL and WT mice which may inform our understanding of cognitive changes in DM1.

Indexed as

Extinction, PsychologicalMyotonic DystrophyReversal LearningAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRewardappetitive extinction taskautistic-like traitsDMSXL-mice modelinflexibility behaviormyotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1)obsessive compulsive disorderreversal learningstimulus-action responsestimulus-reward relationship

Identifiers

PMID40400327
PMCPMC13142853

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.