ArticleJournal of neuromuscular diseases2025
Altered reversal and extinction learning in the DMSXL mouse model of type I myotonic dystrophy (DM1): An exploratory study.
Article in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundCognitive changes in type 1 myotonic dystrophy (DM1) have a pronounced negative effect on quality of life measures. Despite this, the neural basis of these changes is poorly understood. DM1 patients demonstrate deficits in motivation and cognitive flexibility, reflective of apathy and obsessive-compulsive / autistic-like traits.ObjectiveThese traits can be readily assessed using reversal learning and appetitive extinction tasks. Reversal learning assesses the ability to learn following a change in a rule and can evaluate cognitive flexibility and habitual responding, while appetitive extinction assesses the ability to suppress a stimulus-action response following the change in the stimulus-reward relationship from rewarded to non-rewarded.MethodsIn this study we evaluated the performance of a mouse model of DM1, the DMSXL mouse in reversal learning and appetitive extinction tasks.ResultsSimilar to C57/BL6 wild type (WT) mice, DMSXL mice were able to learn stimulus reward relationships, however, in the late phase of reversal learning experiment DMSXL mice demonstrated increased habit-like behavior (increased number of correct responses). Following rule switching, DMSXL mice produced an increased number of errors compared to WT and showed increased latency to deliver correct responses. In the extinction task, DMSXL mice showed the ability to more rapidly extinguish a previously rewarded response than WT mice.ConclusionsThese findings constitute differences in cognitive flexibility, rule learning and motivation between DMSXL and WT mice which may inform our understanding of cognitive changes in DM1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.