Evidence mapPaperPMID 40400482Full record

ArticlePain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain2025

Assessment and Correlates of Different Phenotypical Characteristics of Psychological Flexibility in Adapting to Chronic Pain: A Feasibility Study.

Ivo P Legierse, Henriët van Middendorp, Maike Borgonjen, Ewald M Bronkhorst, Martijn F Pisters, Kris C P Vissers, Monique A H Steegers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ivo P LegierseDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2437-1934
Henriët van MiddendorpHealth, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Maike BorgonjenPro Persona Mental Healthcare, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Ewald M BronkhorstDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Martijn F PistersResearch Group Empowering Healthy Behaviour, Department of Health Innovation and Technology, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Kris C P VissersDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Monique A H SteegersDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0812-5089

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study examined the feasibility of a research protocol for assessing psychological flexibility in patients with chronic pain to gain insight into the uniqueness of different phenotypes of psychological flexibility and to tentatively test whether psychological flexibility is associated with effective adaptation to chronic pain.

methodsIn a cross-sectional study, in twenty patients with chronic pain, different phenotypes of psychological flexibility and a variety of positive and negative health indicators were assessed. Correlations were explored to determine the unicity of the different phenotypes of psychological flexibility and to test their associations with chronic pain.

resultsAll phenotypes of psychological flexibility could be assessed reliably in this patient group. Preliminary findings suggest that all phenotypes assess unique flexibility aspects (79% of the intercorrelations were less than moderate; > -0.30, < 0.30). Higher levels of different psychological flexibility phenotypes were generally associated with higher positive health indicators and lower negative health indicators (70% of the moderate correlations; ≤ -0.30 or ≥ 0.30 were in the expected direction).

conclusionsResults confirm that the protocol is feasible for large-scale research in patients with chronic pain and that it is useful to further investigate the different phenotypes of psychological flexibility in relation to optimal adaptation to chronic pain in a longitudinal study. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Psychological flexibility is a potentially important future target in the treatment (e.g., biofeedback, cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness) of patients with chronic pain.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalChronic PainAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPhenotypeadaptationbiopsychosocial modelchronic painhealthphenotypic variabilitypsychological flexibility

Identifiers

PMID40400482
PMCPMC12096269

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.