Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40400670›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Large animal models in gynecology: status and future perspectives.

Dan Zhao, Xue Li, Xu Zheng, Xiangrui Xie, Yanan Zhao, Yang Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dan ZhaoCollege of Acupuncture and Massage, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Xue LiDepartment of Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Xu ZhengDepartment of Tuina, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Xiangrui XieCollege of Acupuncture and Massage, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Yanan ZhaoInstitute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Acupuncture, Affiliated Hospital of Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, Jilin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of large animal models in gynecology research and provide future perspectives. Gynecological diseases are diverse and pose a serious threat to women's physical and mental health. In addition to the commonly used small animal models, large animal models have gradually entered the field of gynecological research. Results suggest that large animal models offer significant advantages in simulating human physiological processes, despite ethical and practical challenges. This paper reviews the application of large animal models in the study of gynecological diseases, provides a summary of the research characteristics of large animal models, analyses the advantages and challenges of these models in disease research, and compares the research differences between large and small animal models. It also discusses the relationship between these models and new alternative models, with a view to providing more new ideas for the selection of animal models in the study of gynecological diseases.

Indexed as

gynecological diseaseslarge animal modelsnon-human primatespigssheep

Identifiers

PMID40400670
PMCPMC12092389

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.