ArticleCureus2025
Perceptions of Digital Health App Usage Among Women Attending Obstetrics and Gynecology Outpatient Department in a Tertiary Care Setting.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Digitalization is transforming healthcare, with tools like digital health apps and platforms becoming integral. India's Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission (ABDM) aims to create a digitally empowered healthcare system, utilizing the Ayushman Bharat Health Account (ABHA) for seamless access to health services. This study evaluates patients' perceptions of digital healthcare services, specifically ABHA, in a tertiary care setting, and identifies factors influencing adoption. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted over six months (September 2024-March 2025) among 250 women (aged 18-80) attending the Obstetrics and Gynecology outpatient department (OPD). A validated questionnaire assessed patient perceptions of ABHA registration and digital health records. Demographic data and awareness of digital platforms were collected. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression. Results The mean age of participants was 28 ± 3.2 years. Awareness of digital platforms varied, with 125 (60%) being aware of digital India platforms, 87 (35%) of ABHA, and 50 (20%) of the Swasthya app. The majority of participants (100 (40%)) belonged to the upper lower class of the Kuppuswamy socioeconomic scale. Overall, patients reported high satisfaction with ABHA registration (satisfaction index (SI) = 87.9), perceiving it as simple and efficient. Logistic regression showed no significant influence of age, education, socioeconomic status, or ABHA awareness on digital health app usage. However, the scan and share feature had a lower SI (78.7). Discussion While patients generally viewed ABHA positively, awareness gaps and usability challenges, particularly with the scan and share feature, were identified. Socioeconomic factors did not significantly impact adoption, suggesting effective integration of ABDM into public healthcare. Targeted educational programs and technological improvements are necessary to enhance digital health literacy and adoption. Conclusion This study highlights the importance of addressing awareness and usability barriers to optimize digital health adoption in tertiary care settings. Enhancing patient education and improving digital interfaces can improve healthcare delivery through digital platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.