ReviewAmerican journal of cardiovascular disease2025
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in myocardial infarction with non-obstructed coronary arteries: diagnostic and prognostic value.
Review in American journal of cardiovascular disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing cardiac tumor diagnosis: evaluatingAmerican journal of cardiovascular disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructed coronary arteries (MINOCA) occurs when patients experience a heart attack without significant coronary artery blockage despite showing acute coronary syndrome symptoms. Unlike stable atherosclerosis, MINOCA involves acute myocardial infarction (MI) without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). The diagnostic criteria included meeting the universal MI definition, non-obstructive coronary arteries on angiography (< 50% stenosis), and no apparent cause of the acute event. The causes include coronary, cardiac, and extracardiac origins, such as plaque rupture, coronary spasm, myocarditis, or pulmonary embolism. MINOCA affects 5-6% of patients with acute MI undergoing angiography, with variations based on demographic factors. Although MINOCA was initially believed to have a favorable outcome, recent findings have indicated that MINOCA patients have a worse prognosis than the general population. Current guidelines strongly advocate the use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) to evaluate suspected MINOCA cases. However, multiple studies have demonstrated that CMR may fail to detect some instances of MINOCA, particularly in cases of mild inflammation or minor infractions. This could lead to a false-negative diagnosis requiring further testing. This review aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of CMR in patients with potential MINOCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.