Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40401755›Full record

GuidelineEuropean stroke journal2025

European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guideline on visual impairment in stroke.

Fiona J Rowe, Lauren R Hepworth, María Begoña Coco-Martin, Celine R Gillebert, Luis Leal-Vega, Anja Palmowski-Wolfe, Eleni Papageorgiou, Stephen James Ryan, Karolina Skorkovska, Anne Hege Aamodt

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in European stroke journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. A randomized controlled trial of Scanning Eye trAining as a Rehabilitation Choice for Hemianopia after stroke (SEARCH).International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Editorial.European stroke journal · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fiona J RoweInstitute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9210-9131
Lauren R HepworthInstitute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8542-9815
María Begoña Coco-MartinDepartment of Medicine, Dermatology and Toxicology, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Celine R GillebertDepartment Brain and Cognition, Leuven Brain Institute (LBI), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6686-7262
Luis Leal-VegaDepartment of Medicine, Dermatology and Toxicology, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7847-413X
Anja Palmowski-WolfeUniversity Eye Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4062-4814
Eleni PapageorgiouDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-1931-4168
Stephen James RyanDepartment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0009-0002-5262-4862
Karolina SkorkovskaDepartment of Optometry and Orthoptics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0009-0009-6878-3623
Anne Hege AamodtDepartment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2824-2760

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual impairment due to stroke is common. However, controversy exists on how best to screen for visual impairment, the timing at which to screen, and on the optimal management of the varying types of visual impairment. This European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guideline provides evidence-based recommendations to assist clinicians in decision-making on screening methods, timing of screening and assessment and management options in adult stroke survivors. The target audience for this guideline is health care providers involved in stroke care from prehospital screening, in stroke units and rehabilitation centres, ophthalmological departments and community stroke care, and for stroke survivors and care givers. The guideline was developed according to the ESO standard operating procedure and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. The working group identified relevant clinical questions, performed systematic reviews and, where possible, meta-analyses of the literature, assessed the quality of the available evidence and made specific recommendations. Expert consensus statements were provided where insufficient evidence was available to provide recommendations based on the GRADE approach. We found evidence of acceptability and feasibility of early visual screening within 1 week of stroke onset. We describe the accuracy of various vision screening tools at pre-hospital and hyper/acute stages as well as specialist vision assessment. We suggest vision screening in all patients with stroke to improve detection of their visual problems We describe a range of treatment options for visual impairment post-stroke across the typical categories of impaired central vision, ocular stroke (central retinal artery occlusion), eye movements, visual fields, visual neglect and visual perception. This guideline highlights specific areas where robust evidence is lacking and where further definitive randomised controlled trials and diagnostic accuracy studies are required.

Indexed as

StrokeVision DisordersEuropeHumanseye movementsGuidelineocular strokescreeningstrokesystematic reviewtreatmentvisionvisual fieldsvisual impairmentvisual neglectvisual perception

Identifiers

PMID40401755
PMCPMC12098360

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.