Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40402999›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2025

Cost-effective solutions for high-throughput enzymatic DNA methylation sequencing.

Amy Longtin, Marina M Watowich, Baptiste Sadoughi, Rachel M Petersen, Sarah F Brosnan, Kenneth Buetow, Qiuyin Cai, Cayo Biobank Research Unit, Michael D Gurven, James P Higham and 21 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Amy LongtinDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8863-1423
Marina M WatowichDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Baptiste SadoughiSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5626-3318
Rachel M PetersenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Sarah F BrosnanDepartments of Psychology & Philosophy, Neuroscience Institute, Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, and the Language Research Center, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GeorgiaUnited States of America.
Kenneth BuetowSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4439-0939
Qiuyin CaiDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9384-5648
Cayo Biobank Research Unit
Michael D GurvenDepartment of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
James P HighamDepartment of Anthropology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Heather M HighlandDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Yi-Ting HuangVanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Hillard KaplanInstitute for Economics and Society, Chapman University, Orange, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7398-7358
Thomas S KraftDepartment of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0634-9233
Yvonne A L LimDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4050-6332
Jirong LongDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Amanda D MelinDepartment of Anthropology & Archaeology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0612-2514
Michael J MontagueDepartment of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0253-4404
Jamie RobersonVanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Kee Seong NgDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Michael L PlattDepartment of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3912-8821
India A Schneider-CreaseCenter for Evolution and Medicine, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
Jonathan StieglitzDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Toulouse School of Economics, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, Université Toulouse Capitole, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5985-9643
Benjamin C TrumbleCenter for Evolution and Medicine, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3201-0628
Vivek V VenkataramanDepartment of Anthropology & Archaeology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Ian J WallaceDepartment of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1837-5260
Jie WuDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Noah Snyder-MacklerSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3026-6160
Angela JonesVanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Alexander G BickEvolutionary Studies Initiative, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Amanda J LeaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8827-2750

Funding

Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment Research ProgramP30CA068485 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Ben Ho Park · 1995 to 2026
$172.8M
Testing Hypothesized Pathways Linking Infection, Physical Activity, Apoe Genotype, And Biological Sex To Low Dementia Prevalence And Reduced Brain Atrophy In Two Native American PopulationsR01AG054442 · NIA · CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY · PI CALEB E FINCH, Margaret Gatz · 2022 to 2026
$15.2M
Clonal Hematopoiesis Aging Resiliency MechanismsR01AG088657 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Alexander Bick, Siddhartha Jaiswal · 2024 to 2026
$6.6M
Social modifiers of the pace of aging across multiple domains and tissuesR01AG060931 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BRENT, LAUREN JOHANNA NICOLE, HIGHAM, JAMES P · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
Animal Model of Genetics and Social Behavior in Autism Spectrum DisordersR01MH096875 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PLATT, MICHAEL L · 2012 to 2016
$3.6M
Establishing the dynamics of lymphoid clonal hematopoiesis and its aging-related disease consequencesR01AG083736 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Paul L. Auer, Alexander Bick · 2023 to 2026
$2.8M
Impacts of hurricanes and social buffering on biological aging in a free-ranging animal modelR01AG084706 · NIA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Lauren Johanna Nicole Brent, James P Higham · 2023 to 2026
$2.5M
Targeting Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential Using Human GeneticsDP5OD029586 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BICK, ALEXANDER · 2020 to 2024
$2.3M
Early life environmental effects: molecular mechanisms and inter-individual variationR35GM147267 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Amanda Lea · 2022 to 2026
$2.0M
Neurogenomics of Vulnerability and Resilience to Mental Health Syndromes in Response to Extreme Life EventsR01MH118203 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PLATT, MICHAEL L · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
Effects of a major natural disaster on the pace of aging in a nonhuman primate modelR56AG071023 · NIA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI BRENT, LAUREN JOHANNA NICOLE, HIGHAM, JAMES P · 2021 to 2021
$839k
Gene regulatory analysis of social integration and resilience during agingR00AG051764 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SNYDER-MACKLER, NOAH · 2017 to 2019
$746k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA068485NIA NIH HHS R00 AG051764NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054442NIA NIH HHS R01 AG060931NIA NIH HHS R01 AG083736NIA NIH HHS R01 AG084706NIA NIH HHS R01 AG088657NIA NIH HHS R21 AG078554NIA NIH HHS R56 AG071023NIA NIH HHS R61 AG078529NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM147267NIH HHS DP5 OD029586NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH096875NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterizing DNA methylation patterns is important for addressing key questions in evolutionary biology, development, geroscience, and medical genomics. While costs are decreasing, whole-genome DNA methylation profiling remains prohibitively expensive for most population-scale studies, creating a need for cost-effective, reduced representation approaches (i.e., assays that rely on microarrays, enzyme digests, or sequence capture to target a subset of the genome). Most common whole genome and reduced representation techniques rely on bisulfite conversion, which can damage DNA resulting in DNA loss and sequencing biases. Enzymatic methyl sequencing (EM-seq) was recently proposed to overcome these issues, but thorough benchmarking of EM-seq combined with cost-effective, reduced representation strategies is currently lacking. To address this gap, we optimized the Targeted Methylation Sequencing protocol (TMS)-which profiles ~4 million CpG sites-for miniaturization, flexibility, and multispecies use. First, we tested modifications to increase throughput and reduce cost, including increasing multiplexing, decreasing DNA input, and using enzymatic rather than mechanical fragmentation to prepare DNA. Second, we compared our optimized TMS protocol to commonly used techniques, specifically the Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip (n = 55 paired samples) and whole genome bisulfite sequencing (n = 6 paired samples). In both cases, we found strong agreement between technologies (R2 = 0.97 and 0.99, respectively). Third, we tested the optimized TMS protocol in three non-human primate species (rhesus macaques, geladas, and capuchins). We captured a high percentage (mean = 77.1%) of targeted CpG sites and produced methylation level estimates that agreed with those generated from reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (R2 = 0.98). Finally, we confirmed that estimates of 1) epigenetic age and 2) tissue-specific DNA methylation patterns are strongly recapitulated using data generated from TMS versus other technologies. Altogether, our optimized TMS protocol will enable cost-effective, population-scale studies of genome-wide DNA methylation levels across human and non-human primate species.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, DNAAnimalsCost-Benefit AnalysisCpG IslandsHumans

Identifiers

PMID40402999
PMCPMC12162101

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.