ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2025
Phase 2 study design and analysis approach for BBT-877: an autotaxin inhibitor targeting idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05483907 (A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, 24-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of BBT-877, as Mono- or add-on Therapy, in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, 24-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of BBT-877, as Mono- or add-on Therapy, in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discovery ofJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Progressive pulmonary fibrosis.European radiology · 2026Review
- Evolving landscape of imaging-based evaluation in systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease-associated interstitial lung disease: from visual assessment to quantitative artificial intelligence-assisted evaluation.Journal of rheumatic diseases · 2026Review
- Gut microbiota dysbiosis and metabolic abnormalities promote oxidative stress and fibrosis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Design of a phase II randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding trial of BI 1819479 in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Decoding lysophosphatidic acid signaling in physiology and disease: mapping the multimodal and multinodal signaling networks.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionProof-of-concept (POC) studies are vital in determining the feasibility of further drug development, primarily by assessing preliminary efficacy signals with credible endpoints. However, traditional POC studies in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) can suffer from low credibility due to small sample sizes and short durations, leading to non-replicable results in larger phase III trials. To address this, we are conducting a 24-week POC study with 120 patients with IPF, using a statistically supported sample size and incorporating exploratory CT-based imaging biomarkers, to support decision-making in the case of non-significant primary endpoint results. This approach aims to provide data to enable a robust decision-making process for advancing clinical development of BBT-877. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, approximately 120 patients with IPF will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive placebo or 200 mg of BBT-877 two times per day over 24 weeks, with stratification according to background use of an antifibrotic treatment (pirfenidone background therapy, nintedanib background therapy or no background therapy). The primary endpoint is absolute change in forced vital capacity (FVC) (mL) from baseline to week 24. Key secondary endpoints include change from baseline to week 24 in %-predicted FVC, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, 6 min walk test, patient-reported outcomes, pharmacokinetics and safety, and tolerability. Key exploratory endpoints include eLung-based CT evaluation and biomarker-based assessment of pharmacodynamics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is being conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki principles, Good Clinical Practice guidance, applicable local regulations and local ethics committees. An independent data monitoring committee unblinded to individual subject treatment allocation will evaluate safety and efficacy data on a regular basis throughout the study. The results of this study will be presented at scientific conferences and peer-review publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05483907.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.