Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40404202›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025

INBRX-106: a hexavalent OX40 agonist that drives superior antitumor responses via optimized receptor clustering.

Nisha Holay, Rashi Yadav, Sae Jeong Ahn, Melissa J Kasiewicz, Anya Polovina, Annah S Rolig, Thi Staebler, Bryan Becklund, Noah D Simons, Yoshinobu Koguchi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. OX40/OX40L modulation: A target for regulating T cells in cutaneous inflammatory disorders.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Review
  5. Affinity Enhancement in Discrete Multivalent MegaMolecules.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nisha HolayEarle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4363-3521
Rashi YadavEarle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Sae Jeong AhnInhibrx Biosciences Inc, La Jolla, California, USA.
Melissa J KasiewiczEarle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Anya PolovinaInhibrx Biosciences Inc, La Jolla, California, USA.
Annah S RoligEarle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7080-4352
Thi StaeblerInhibrx Biosciences Inc, La Jolla, California, USA.
Bryan BecklundInhibrx Biosciences Inc, La Jolla, California, USA.
Noah D SimonsEarle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Yoshinobu KoguchiEarle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Brendan P EckelmanInhibrx Biosciences Inc, La Jolla, California, USA.
Yaiza Diaz de DuranaInhibrx Biosciences Inc, La Jolla, California, USA william.redmond@providence.org yaiza@inhibrx.com.
William L RedmondEarle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA william.redmond@providence.org yaiza@inhibrx.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2572-1731

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmunotherapies targeting immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer treatment but are limited by incomplete patient responses. Costimulatory agonists like OX40 (CD134), a tumor necrosis factor receptor family member critical for T-cell survival and differentiation, have shown preclinical promise but limited clinical success due to suboptimal receptor activation. Conventional bivalent OX40 agonists fail to induce the trimeric engagement required for optimal downstream signaling. To address this, we developed INBRX-106, a hexavalent OX40 agonist designed to enhance receptor clustering independently of Fc-mediated crosslinking and boost antitumor T-cell responses.

methodsWe assessed INBRX-106's effects on receptor clustering, signal transduction, and T-cell activation using NF-kß reporter assays, confocal microscopy, flow cytometry, and single-cell RNA sequencing. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated in murine tumor models and

resultsINBRX-106 demonstrated superior receptor clustering and downstream signaling compared with bivalent agonists, leading to robust T-cell activation and proliferation. In murine models, hexavalent OX40 agonism resulted in significant tumor regression, enhanced survival, and increased CD8

conclusionsOur data establish hexavalent INBRX-106 as a differentiated and more potent OX40 agonist, showcasing its ability to overcome the limitations of conventional bivalent therapies by inducing superior receptor clustering and multimeric engagement. This unique clustering mechanism amplifies OX40 signaling, driving robust T-cell activation, proliferation, and effector function in preclinical and clinical settings. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of INBRX-106 and its capacity to redefine OX40-targeted immunotherapy, providing a compelling rationale for its further clinical development in combination with checkpoint inhibitors.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyReceptors, OX40AnimalsCell Line, TumorClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicFemaleHumansLymphocyte ActivationMiceReceptors, OX40ImmunotherapySolid tumorT cellTumor infiltrating lymphocyte - TIL

Identifiers

PMID40404202
PMCPMC12097044

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.