ReviewSeminars in perinatology2025
Towards better enrollment decision-making for perinatal clinical research: Reconsidering recruitment and consent processes to support family values and preferences.
Review in Seminars in perinatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acceptability and Feasibility of an Educational Intervention to Improve Researcher-Participant Interactions in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Clinical Trial: Research Team Feedback on the BRIEF Intervention.American journal of perinatology · 2026Trial
- Facilitators and barriers in obtaining informed consent for neonatal research: a scoping review.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWhether to participate in clinical research is a special type of decision for parents with infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Parents often report negative experiences being approached for NICU research and researchers struggle to enroll a representative sample. We consider how enrollment decision-making might be better supported by integrating learnings from clinical decision-making. FINDING: Approaches to supporting decision-making about clinical research, though distinct from those for clinical decision-making, share many similarities. We consider ways researchers may incorporate advances in knowledge about clinical decision-making to: (a) improve documents used for regulatory purposes (e.g., consent forms), and (b) better support relationship building between researchers and parents considering research enrollment.
conclusionResearchers may benefit from considering approaches to enrollment decision-making that draw on clinical decision-making methods. Future work should assess the impact of such approaches on parental experiences of recruitment; enrollment and retention rates; and representative inclusion of NICU populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.