Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40404236›Full record

ReviewSeminars in perinatology2025

Towards better enrollment decision-making for perinatal clinical research: Reconsidering recruitment and consent processes to support family values and preferences.

Elliott Mark Weiss, Benjamin S Wilfond, Stephanie A Kraft

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in perinatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elliott Mark WeissTreuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: emweiss@uw.edu.
Benjamin S WilfondTreuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Stephanie A KraftDepartment of Bioethics and Decision Sciences, Geisinger College of Health Sciences, Danville, PA, USA.

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
Improving Diversity in Neonatal Clinical Trial EnrollmentK23HD103872 · NICHD · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI WEISS, ELLIOTT M · 2021 to 2025
$804k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD103872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWhether to participate in clinical research is a special type of decision for parents with infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Parents often report negative experiences being approached for NICU research and researchers struggle to enroll a representative sample. We consider how enrollment decision-making might be better supported by integrating learnings from clinical decision-making. FINDING: Approaches to supporting decision-making about clinical research, though distinct from those for clinical decision-making, share many similarities. We consider ways researchers may incorporate advances in knowledge about clinical decision-making to: (a) improve documents used for regulatory purposes (e.g., consent forms), and (b) better support relationship building between researchers and parents considering research enrollment.

conclusionResearchers may benefit from considering approaches to enrollment decision-making that draw on clinical decision-making methods. Future work should assess the impact of such approaches on parental experiences of recruitment; enrollment and retention rates; and representative inclusion of NICU populations.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchDecision MakingInformed ConsentParentsPatient SelectionFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalParental ConsentEquityNeonatal clinical trialsRecruitmentResearch ethics

Identifiers

PMID40404236
PMCPMC12407186

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.