ReviewClinical endoscopy2025
Digital platforms, virtual reality, and augmented reality in gastrointestinal endoscopy training.
Review in Clinical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Remote training in procedural tasks has experienced robust growth in recent years, spurred by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic to meet the need for basic and continued skills development, including in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Remote endoscopy training offers learners the opportunity for skill acquisition, real-time feedback, and access to experts from around the world, and gives mentors the ability to educate trainees without the need to travel themselves. Remote training can be cost-effective but requires reliable technology and continuous assessment to ensure training quality. Ethical and legal issues related to patient safety may also exist. Training using virtual or augmented reality, on the other hand, does not involve patients and, hence, has no patient safety, legal, or ethical issues. Multiple endoscopic scenarios, from basic to advanced, can be practiced multiple times with immediate feedback on performance. These innovations are expected to not only increase individual endoscopy skills but also expand access to specialized care in remote areas, either in the same country or in underserved regions of the world. This review describes various techniques in remote endoscopy training with associated advantages and drawbacks and analyzes research outcomes on the effectiveness of remote endoscopy training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.