Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40404834›Full record

ArticleHeredity2025

How partial phenotyping to reduce generation intervals can help to increase annual genetic gain in selected honeybee populations.

Tristan Kistler, Evert W Brascamp, Benjamin Basso, Florence Phocas, Piter Bijma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tristan KistlerUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France. tristan.kistler@inrae.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-0798-0473
Evert W BrascampAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2284-0513
Benjamin BassoUMT PrADE, 84914, Avignon, France.
Florence PhocasUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1161-3665
Piter BijmaAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) ANR-11-IDEX-0003-02Association Instituts Carnot (Carnot Institutes Network) Project BeeMuSe
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Honeybee breeding is organized around annual cycles, following seasonal change. Generation intervals are thus commonly multiples of whole years. Most queens are generally raised during spring or early summer in temperate climates. A generation interval of 1 year limits phenotyping to early recordable traits, before the spring following queens' births. Some traits, however, can only be recorded later, as is typically the case for total honey yield. Their recording on selection candidates thus increases the generation interval to at least 2 years, a common interval on the dam path. Using stochastic simulation, we investigated the impact of halving the dam generation interval and therefore recording only early traits on candidate dams. The generation interval on the sire path remained at 2 years with complete phenotyping. Breeding goals with varying weights on early and late traits were considered, as well as negative to positive genetic correlations between traits. The acceleration of the breeding scheme generally increased genetic gain for two-trait breeding goals, from 0% up to +47% after 20 years of selection. Although inbreeding rates per generation were slightly lower in the accelerated breeding scheme, inbreeding rates per year were significantly higher. This was due to the faster generation turnover (+33%) leading to 20-30% higher inbreeding coefficients (+0.04 to +0.07) after 20 years of selection. To avoid too high inbreeding, shortening the generation interval should be accompanied by strategies to limit inbreeding while still retaining most of the genetic gain, such as increasing the breeding nucleus size by relaxing selection intensity.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationPhenotypeSelection, GeneticAnimalsBeesBreedingFemaleInbreedingMaleModels, GeneticSeasons

Identifiers

PMID40404834
PMCPMC12217302

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.