Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40405064›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2025

AoUPRS: A cost-effective and versatile PRS calculator for the All of Us Program.

Ahmed Khattab, Shang-Fu Chen, Nathan Wineinger, Ali Torkamani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Integrating Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) for Personalized Diabetes Care: Advancing Clinical Practice with Tailored Pharmacological Approaches.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahmed KhattabIntegrative Structural and Computational Biology, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7253-199X
Shang-Fu ChenIntegrative Structural and Computational Biology, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5467-288X
Nathan WineingerIntegrative Structural and Computational Biology, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Ali TorkamaniIntegrative Structural and Computational Biology, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA, USA. atorkama@scripps.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0232-8053

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe All of Us (AoU) Research Program provides a comprehensive genomic dataset to accelerate health research and medical breakthroughs. Despite its potential, researchers face significant challenges, including high costs and inefficiencies associated with data extraction and analysis. AoUPRS addresses these challenges by offering a versatile and cost-effective tool for calculating polygenic risk scores (PRS), enabling both experienced and novice researchers to leverage the AoU dataset for large-scale genomic discoveries.

methodsWe evaluated three PRS models from the PGS Catalog (coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and type 2 diabetes) using two distinct approaches in the Hail framework: MatrixTable (MT), a dense representation, and Variant Dataset (VDS), a sparse representation optimized for large-scale genomic data. Computational cost, resource usage, and processing time were compared. To assess the similarity of PRS performance between these two approaches, we compared odds ratios (ORs) and area under the curve (AUC). Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was also computed to quantify agreement between PRS scores generated by MT and VDS.

resultsThe VDS approach reduced computational costs by up to 99.51% (e.g., from $32 to $0.036 for a 51-SNP score) while maintaining PRS estimates that were highly similar to those obtained using the MT approach. Across all three PRS models, AUC comparisons showed minimal differences between MT and VDS, indicating that both approaches yield consistent PRS performance. Agreement between PRS scores calculated by both approaches was further supported by Lin's CCC values ranging from 0.9199 to 0.9944, confirming strong concordance. Empirical cumulative distribution function (ECDF) plots further illustrated the near-identical distribution of PRS values across methods.

conclusionsAoUPRS enables efficient and cost-effective PRS computation within AoU, providing substantial cost savings while maintaining highly consistent PRS estimates. These findings support the use of AoUPRS for large-scale genomic risk assessment, making the AoU dataset more accessible and practical for diverse research applications. The tool's open-source availability on GitHub, coupled with detailed documentation and tutorials, ensures accessibility and ease of use for the scientific community.

Indexed as

GenomicsMultifactorial InheritanceSoftwareAtrial FibrillationCoronary Artery DiseaseCost-Benefit AnalysisDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansUnited StatesAll of Us (AoU) ProgramCost-Effective GenomicsPolygenic Risk Score (PRS)Scalable PRS Calculation

Identifiers

PMID40405064
PMCPMC12096765

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.