ArticleBMC health services research2025
A scoping review of the utilization of mobile stroke units in low and lower middle-income countries: current evidence, implications and future direction.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Global Health Perspective on the 2026 AHA/ASA Stroke Guidelines: Lessons from the Indian Health System.Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Factors associated with delayed hospital presentation following stroke in Senegal: a mixed methods study.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Localized AI for stroke care in LMICs: a framework to overcome structural and diagnostic barriers.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLow and Lower-Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) have the highest stroke incidence, prevalence, and case fatality rates globally. Current evidence suggests Mobile Stroke Units (MSUs) outperform traditional Emergency Medicine Services (EMS) in time metrics, cost-effectiveness, and long-term outcomes. MSUs could potentially improve stroke outcomes in resource-constrained settings by addressing critical challenges related to prehospital delays, health-seeking behavior, and access to expertise. PURPOSE: This scoping review aims to assess the existing literature and knowledge gaps on the utilization of mobile stroke units in LMICS, their impact on stroke outcomes, and cost-effectiveness. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a detailed search of PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, African Index Medicus, and Publicly Available Content Database (ProQuest) inception to April 15, 2024. Google Scholar and TRIP Pro were also searched to identify Grey literature. African Journals Online, references were also hand-searched.
resultsSeven hundred and eighty-five studies were screened; only two met the eligibility criteria. Cherian et al. report the first use of a mobile stroke unit (MSU) in India, detailing its operations during the first year and the challenges encountered. According to the authors, fewer patients utilize MSUs in India compared to other parts of the world due to challenges such as a lack of awareness and affordability. Osuegbu et al. also report the absence of both fixed and mobile stroke units in Rivers State, Nigeria.
conclusionThere is currently very limited data to support the contextual suitability of MSU or implementation strategies to guide its integration into stroke care systems in LMICs. Further research is needed to examine the utilization, barriers, impact, and cost-effectiveness of Mobile Stroke Units (MSUs) in low- and middle-income countries. This could inform stakeholders and policymakers about the potential role and value of MSUs within stroke care systems in these settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.