ArticleScience progress
Apophyseal injury of the fifth lumbar transverse process in adolescent athletes: A report of two cases.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lumbar transverse process injuries are rare in adolescent athletes, with very few documented cases related to sports activities, particularly involving the fifth lumbar region. This report aims to highlight the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of apophyseal injuries of the fifth lumbar transverse process in two adolescent athletes. Two adolescent athletes, a 14-year-old boy and a 15-year-old girl, presented with subacute onset of unilateral lower back pain (LBP) following repetitive athletic activities. Both patients had a history of spondylolysis that had previously healed. Initial clinical assessments, including physical examination and imaging studies (CT and MRI), were performed to diagnose the nature of their injuries. Conservative treatment, including rest and specific rehabilitation exercises, was employed. Both patients exhibited right-sided LBP exacerbated by specific movements, mimicking symptoms of lumbar spondylolysis. Imaging studies revealed no evidence of spondylolysis but indicated a slight widening of the growth plate and high-intensity signal changes in the right fifth lumbar transverse process apophysis. Both patients returned to their sports activities within a month of starting treatment, with no recurrence of symptoms reported during follow-ups. Apophyseal injuries of the fifth lumbar transverse process, though rare, should be considered in the differential diagnosis of adolescent athletes presenting with unilateral LBP, especially in the absence of acute trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.