Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40406365›Full record

ArticleHealth information science and systems2025

Automatic detection of gastrointestinal system abnormalities using deep learning-based segmentation and classification methods.

Abdullah Şener, Burhan Ergen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health information science and systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abdullah ŞenerManagement Information Systems, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Fırat University, Elazığ, 23100 Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-8927-5638
Burhan ErgenComputer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Fırat University, Elazığ, 23100 Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-3244-2615

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early diagnosis and precise treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) diseases are crucial for reducing mortality and improving quality of life. In this context, the detection and classification of abnormalities in endoscopic images is an important support for specialists during the diagnostic process. In this study, an innovative deep learning approach for the segmentation and classification of pathological regions in the GI system is presented. In the first phase of the study, a novel segmentation network called GISegNet was developed. GISegNet is a deep learning-based architecture tailored for accurate detection of anomalies in the GI system. Experiments conducted on the Kvasir dataset showed that GISegNet achieved excellent results on performance metrics such as Jaccard and Dice coefficients and outperformed other segmentation models with a higher accuracy rate (93.16%). In the second phase, a hybrid deep learning method was proposed for classifying anomalies in the GI system. The features extracted from the transformer-based models were fused and optimized using the Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) algorithm. The classification process was performed using Support Vector Machines (SVM). As a result of feature fusion and selection, the second model, which combined features from DeiT and ViT models, achieved the best performance with an accuracy rate of 95.2%. By selecting a subset of 300 features optimized by the mRMR algorithm, the accuracy (95.3%) was maintained while optimizing the computational cost. These results show that the proposed deep learning approaches can serve as reliable tools for the detection and classification of diseases of the GI system.

Indexed as

Automated classification and diagnosisDeep learning-based segmentationEndoscopic ımage analysisGastrointestinal system abnormalitiesGISegNet

Identifiers

PMID40406365
PMCPMC12095780

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.