Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40406591›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

The Impact of the Lunar Cycle and Season on Small Mammal Communities Near a Large Metropolitan Area.

Tasha Oosthuizen, Maria K Oosthuizen, Neville Pillay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tasha OosthuizenSchool of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3124-9939
Maria K OosthuizenSchool of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6305-8283
Neville PillaySchool of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0778-726X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small mammals are prey to a range of predators and consequently use environmental cues, such as light, to assess the level of predation risk in their environment. The lunar cycle significantly influences the fear landscape for prey species because their risk level varies with visibility. We conducted small mammal surveys in two communities in close proximity to each other on a peri-urban site in South Africa. We investigated the abundance, composition and diversity of these communities across the lunar cycle and seasons. As predicted, we trapped the highest number of individuals and species on new moon nights, which have low light levels and thus indicate a reduced perceived predation risk. Winter showed a higher abundance compared to the other seasons, which could be explained by a decline in naturally available resources in winter. We captured more individuals and species on one site compared to the other site, largely because of the different microhabitats in the two sites; one site had a lower density of trees and more bare soil areas. Our study provides the first evidence of the impact the lunar cycle has on small mammal communities in southern Africa. Based on our findings of decreased activity of small mammals under increased lunar visibility, we hypothesise that small mammal communities in southern Africa will be negatively affected by the increased occurrence of artificial light at night, which could have wider ecosystem impacts.

Indexed as

abundancedemographylunar cyclesmall mammalsSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID40406591
PMCPMC12094881

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.