Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40406619›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Altered microstate C and D dynamics in high social anxiety: a resting-state EEG study.

Huoyin Zhang, Binyu Peng, Yutong Liu, Yu Xi, Yi Lei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huoyin ZhangSchool of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Binyu PengCollege of Psychology, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China.
Yutong LiuSchool of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Yu XiSchool of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Yi LeiSchool of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Social anxiety is characterized by excessive fear of negative evaluation and avoidance in social situations. While its neural processing patterns are well-documented, the millisecond-level temporal dynamics of brain functional networks remain poorly understood. This study used EEG microstate analysis to explore the dynamic neural mechanisms underlying social anxiety. Methods: Eyes-closed resting-state EEG data were collected from 41 participants, divided into high social anxiety ( Results: The high social anxiety group exhibited significantly increased duration and coverage of microstate C (associated with processing personally significant information and self-reflection) and decreased duration and coverage of microstate D (associated with executive functioning). Transition probabilities involving microstate C (A ↔ C, B ↔ C) were significantly higher, while those involving microstate D (A ↔ D) were significantly lower in the high social anxiety group. In the low social anxiety group, B ↔ C transition probability showed significant negative correlations with LSAS total and avoidance subscale scores. Discussion: These findings reveal distinct neural dynamics in social anxiety, characterized by heightened self-referential processing (microstate C) and impaired executive functioning (microstate D). The altered transition patterns suggest a predisposition for excessive self-focus and reduced coordination with executive control networks in high social anxiety individuals. These results provide new insights into the neural mechanisms of social anxiety and offer potential directions for clinical interventions and early detection.

Indexed as

EEG microstatesmicrostate Cmicrostate Dresting-state EEGsocial anxiety

Identifiers

PMID40406619
PMCPMC12095283

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.