ReviewCureus2025
Reinforcement Learning in Personalized Medicine: A Comprehensive Review of Treatment Optimization Strategies.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in headache medicine: between automation and the doctor-patient relationship. A systematic review.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Pooled it
- AI-driven techniques for detection and mitigation of SARS-CoV-2 spread: a review, taxonomy, and trends.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Interpreting cancer genetics through a two-step "evolutionary cascade hypothesis": bridging neutral and selective perspectives.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Reinforcement Learning-Based Digital Therapeutic Intervention for Postprostatectomy Incontinence: Development and Pilot Feasibility Study.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Modelling for Precision Dosing of Immunosuppressants in Kidney Transplantation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The spatial revolution in immuno-oncology: artificial intelligence decoding NK cell niches to predict therapeutic response.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence applications in oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for colon cancer: advancing prognosis, toxicity prediction, and dose personalization.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Recent advancements in the application of artificial intelligence-based approaches for screening, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cervical cancer.Oncology reviews · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL), a subset of artificial intelligence, is gaining momentum in personalized medicine due to its ability to model dynamic, sequential decision-making. Unlike traditional machine learning approaches, RL systems adapt treatment protocols based on patient-specific responses and evolving health states, offering a robust strategy for optimizing individualized care. This review explores the integration of RL into personalized medicine across diverse clinical domains, including oncology, chronic disease management, psychiatry, infectious diseases, and rehabilitation. Applications such as chemotherapy scheduling, insulin dosing, personalized antidepressant treatment, and ICU management illustrate RL's capacity to improve therapeutic outcomes by maximizing long-term clinical benefits. Key methodological components, including data integration, reward signal engineering, and interpretability challenges, are discussed alongside solutions such as explainable AI tools, surrogate models, and federated learning. Ethical and regulatory considerations are also examined, highlighting issues such as patient consent, algorithmic bias, and evolving guidelines from regulatory bodies like the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency. The review emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and clinician engagement for the successful deployment of RL in healthcare settings. RL presents a transformative framework for delivering adaptive, equitable, and patient-centered treatment strategies. Future research should focus on implementing it safely, scalably, and transparently to fully harness its potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.