ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Decoding herbal combination models through systematic strategies: insights from target information and traditional Chinese medicine clinical theory.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) utilizes intricate herbal formulations that exemplify the principles of compatibility and synergy. However, the rapid proliferation of herbal data has resulted in redundant information, complicating the understanding of their potential mechanisms. To address this issue, we first established a comprehensive database that encompasses 992 herbs, 18 681 molecules, and 2168 targets. Consequently, we implemented a multi-network strategy based on a core information screening method to elucidate the highly intertwined relationships among the targets of various herbs and to refine herbal target information. Within a non-redundant network framework, separation and overlap analysis demonstrated that the networking of herbs preserves essential clinical information, including their properties, meridians, and therapeutic classifications. Furthermore, two notable trends emerged from the statistical analyses of classical TCM formulas: the separation of herbs and the overlap between herbs and diseases. This phenomenon is termed the herbal combination model (HCM), validated through statistical analyses of two representative case studies: the common cold and rheumatoid arthritis. Additionally, in vivo and in vitro experiments with the new formula YanChuanQin (YanHuSuo-Corydalis Rhizoma, ChuanWu-Aconiti Radix, and QinJiao-Gentianae Macrophyllae Radix) for acute gouty arthritis further support the HCM. Overall, this computational method provides a systematic network strategy for exploring herbal combinations in complex and poorly understood diseases from a non-redundant perspective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.