Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40407518›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2025

Evaluation of the Performance of Newborn Screening for Tyrosinemia Type 1 in The Netherlands: Suggestions for Improvements Using Additional Biomarkers in Addition to Succinylacetone.

Marelle J Bouva, Allysa M Kuypers, Evelien A Kemper, Rose E Maase, Annet M Bosch, Francjan J van Spronsen, Annemieke C Heijboer, M Rebecca Heiner-Fokkema, Sandra G Heil, Anita Boelen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marelle J BouvaCentre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3721 MA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7699-4887
Allysa M KuypersSection of Metabolic Diseases, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1947-5949
Evelien A KemperDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, IJsselland Hospital, 2906 ZC Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands.
Rose E MaaseCentre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3721 MA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Annet M BoschAmsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Francjan J van SpronsenSection of Metabolic Diseases, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3773-1929
Annemieke C HeijboerAmsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6712-9955
M Rebecca Heiner-FokkemaLaboratory of Metabolic Diseases, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3477-0770
Sandra G HeilCentre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3721 MA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Anita BoelenAmsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4994-2918

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, Dutch newborns are screened for tyrosinemia type 1 (TT1) using succinylacetone (SA) as the biomarker. Although the sensitivity of the test is high, a high number of false positives is observed. Here, the aim is to evaluate the current Dutch newborn-screening protocol and to assess alternatives, specifically the use of biomarkers that are already being measured, to increase the positive predictive value (PPV). TT1 screening was performed with the Revvity NeoBase assay between 2008 and 2017, and since 2018, the Revvity NeoBase 2 assay has been used. Data from 2018 to 2021 were used for evaluation. To simulate alternative screening protocols, these data were enriched with results of referrals from other periods and a false negative (FN) from 2010. In 2018-2021, 693,821 newborns were screened, resulting in 23 referrals, of whom two were TT1 patients. For this period, to date, no FN have been reported, resulting in a provisional sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 99.997%, and a PPV and negative predictive value of 9% and 100%, respectively. To improve the PPV, we combined SA, tyrosine (tyr), tyr × SA and tyr/phenylalanine and achieved a PPV of 72% for this dataset without introducing FN in the original dataset. This illustrates that future screening for TT1 may benefit from the addition of these biomarkers.

Indexed as

dried blood spotneonatal screeningnewbornpositive predictive valuesensitivitysuccinylacetoneThe Netherlandstyrosinemia type 1

Identifiers

PMID40407518
PMCPMC12101382

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.