ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025
Cross-site harmonization of diffusion MRI data without matched training subjects.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of artificial intelligence in paediatric oncology imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Harmonization in magnetic resonance imaging: A survey of acquisition, image-level, and feature-level methods.Medical image analysis · 2026Review
- Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging in stroke: current applications, limitations, and future directions.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- Effect of a consistent reconstruction algorithm on inter-scanner reproducibility in diffusion MRI.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Cross-site harmonization of diffusion MRI data without matched training subjects.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDiffusion MRI (dMRI) data typically suffer of significant cross-site variability, which prevents naively performing pooled analyses. To attenuate cross-site variability, harmonization methods such as the rotational invariant spherical harmonics (RISH) have been introduced to harmonize the dMRI data at the signal level. A common requirement of the RISH method is the availability of healthy individuals who are matched at the group level, which may not always be readily available, particularly retrospectively. In this work, we propose a framework to harmonize dMRI without matched training groups.
methodsOur framework learns harmonization features while controlling for potential covariates using a voxel-based generalized linear model (GLM). RISH-GLM allows us to simultaneously harmonize data from any number of sites while also accounting for covariates of interest, thus not requiring matched training subjects. Additionally, RISH-GLM can harmonize data from multiple sites in a single step, whereas RISH is performed for each site independently.
resultsWe considered data of training subjects from retrospective cohorts acquired with three different scanners and performed three harmonization experiments of increasing complexity. First, we demonstrate that RISH-GLM is equivalent to conventional RISH when trained with data of matched training subjects. Second, we demonstrate that RISH-GLM can effectively learn harmonization with two groups of highly unmatched subjects. Third, we evaluate the ability of RISH-GLM to simultaneously harmonize data from three different sites.
conclusionRISH-GLM can learn cross-site harmonization both from matched and unmatched groups of training subjects and can effectively be used to harmonize data of multiple sites in one single step.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.