SynthesisChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2025
The use of DBS in the treatment of childhood cerebral palsy: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurosurgery to restore function in cerebral palsy: current practice and emerging therapies.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Review
- Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of paediatric dystonia due to neuroanatomical abnormalities: a systematic review of efficacy and future perspectives.BMJ neurology open · 2026Article
- Deep brain stimulation in children with acquired dystonia.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of DBS as a therapeutic intervention for managing motor symptoms and improving quality of life in patients with CP.
methodsA systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies were selected from PubMed, SCIELO, and the Regional Portal of BVS using defined inclusion criteria, assessing DBS outcomes on motor function, quality of life, and adverse events. The GRADE system evaluated the risk of bias.
resultsOf the 11 studies reviewed, 107 patients aged 5 to 26 years were included. Most studies focused on bilateral GPi stimulation, with nine reporting improvements in motor symptoms. However, outcomes varied, with significant benefits observed primarily in younger patients. Complications occurred in 22.4% of patients, predominantly infections and device-related issues.
conclusionThis review showed that GPi DBS can improve motor symptoms and reduce disability in patients with CP, although outcomes are variable and influenced by patient characteristics, such as age. Further large-scale longitudinal studies are necessary to optimize candidate selection and enhance long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40407856What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.