Trial reportAnnals of hematology2025
Health-related quality of life with daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone versus bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone alone in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: analysis of the phase 3 OCTANS study.
Trial report in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improved survival in patients admitted to ICU with multiple myeloma: a retrospective cohort analysis.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the phase 3 OCTANS study, daratumumab plus bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone (D-VMP) significantly improved response rates and progression-free survival versus VMP alone in transplant-ineligible Asian patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Understanding the impact of treatment on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is of increasing interest. Here, we report on the impact of D-VMP and VMP on PROs in OCTANS. PROs were a secondary endpoint and were assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30-item (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the EuroQol 5-dimensional descriptive system (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire, administered at screening, every 3 months (Year 1), every 6 months thereafter (until disease progression), and 8 and 16 weeks post disease progression. Treatment effects were estimated using a mixed-effects model with repeated measures. Overall, 220 patients were randomized (D-VMP, n = 146; VMP, n = 74). Compliance rates were 100% at baseline in both treatment groups and remained relatively high by Month 12 (D-VMP, 82.6%; VMP, 67.4%). Comparable improvements from baseline were generally observed between treatment groups across most PRO scores. Significant improvements were observed with D-VMP versus VMP in Global Health Status (GHS) score at 9 months (p = 0.0443) and in social functioning and nausea and vomiting symptom scores at 12 months (p = 0.0042 and p = 0.0012, respectively). In summary, transplant-ineligible Asian patients with NDMM demonstrated improvements in PROs following treatment with D-VMP and VMP; however, greater improvements were observed in GHS, social functioning, and nausea and vomiting symptoms with D-VMP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.