Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40408360›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Determinants of gestational weight gain during pregnancy in a multiethnic UK-based population: Findings from the Born in Bradford cohort study.

Petra A T Araújo, Maria A Quigley, Gillian Santorelli, Victoria Coathup

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Petra A T AraújoNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.
Maria A QuigleyNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.
Gillian SantorelliBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, United Kingdom.
Victoria CoathupNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0557-6757

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUnhealthy maternal weight gain during pregnancy is associated with deleterious outcomes to mothers and their offspring. Current literature on the determinants of gestational weight gain yields inconsistent results, with limited research conducted in the United Kingdom. This study investigates potential determinants of unhealthy gestational weight gain in a multiethnic cohort within Bradford, United Kingdom.

methodsThe study analysed 7,769 singleton pregnancies from the Born in Bradford Cohort. Women were enrolled at ~26 weeks' gestation. Weight at first antenatal appointment, recruitment and/or third trimester were used to calculate weekly average weight gain. This was categorized as 'less than recommended', 'recommended' or 'more than recommended' based on the Institute of Medicine (IOM) criteria. Associations between potential determinants and gestational weight gain were assessed using multinomial logistic regression with recommended gestational weight gain as the reference.

resultsOverall, 22.4% of women gained weight within the recommended range; 20.3% gained less than recommended, and 57.3% gained more than recommended. Key risk factors for gaining less weight than recommended were unhealthy baseline BMI (aOR=1.78 for underweight, aOR=1.3 for obese), higher parity (e.g. aOR=1.46 for 3 + children) and lower socioeconomic status (aOR=1.4). The strongest risk factors for gaining more weight than recommended were high baseline BMI (e.g. aOR=5.86 for obese) and higher psychiatric morbidity score (aOR=1.22); being underweight (aOR=0.58) and higher parity (e.g. aOR=0.70 for 3 + children) were associated with a lower risk of gaining more weight than recommended. The effect of mental health seemed to be particularly important among women of Pakistani background, while parity seemed to play a major role among White British women.

conclusionBaseline BMI, age, socioeconomic position, parity and mental health are associated with unhealthy weight gain during pregnancy in a multiethnic UK population. These findings can help identify at-risk women and inform targeted preventative strategies.

Indexed as

Gestational Weight GainWeight GainAdultBody Mass IndexCohort StudiesEthnicityFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsRisk FactorsUnited KingdomYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40408360
PMCPMC12101682

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.