ArticlePloS one2025
A lithium-ion batteries SOH estimation method based on extracting new features during the constant voltage charging stage and improving BPNN.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Existing state of health (SOH) estimation methods for lithium-ion batteries predominantly extract health features (HF) from constant current (CC) and constant voltage (CV) charging phases. Nevertheless, CC charging phase feature extraction is susceptible to the randomness of the initial charging stage. By contrast, data during the constant voltage (CV) charging stage are preserved intact. The complexity and noise interference of battery data make it difficult to accurately extract health features, and it is necessary to develop effective methods to process the data and extract representative features. In response to this issue, this paper proposes an SOH estimation method for extracting HF at the end of the CV charging stage and optimizes the Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN). Firstly, the current curve during the CV charging stage was transformed into the differential current curve (dQ/dI curve), from which two HFs were extracted. Secondly, addressing the issue of weight and threshold initialization in BPNN, the Coati Optimization Algorithm (COA) was employed to optimize the network (COA-BPNN). Finally, validation was conducted using two publicly available datasets. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method exhibits high accuracy in estimating the SOH of batteries under various environmental temperatures and charging rate conditions. Compared with the traditional BPNN method, the COA-BPNN method reduces the maximum root mean square error and average absolute error of the estimated results to 0.22% and 0.16%, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.