ArticleJournal of advanced research2026
Dynamic heterogeneity towards drug resistance in AML cells is primarily driven by epigenomic mechanism unveiled by multi-omics analysis.
Article in Journal of advanced research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated FHIT and IDH2 biomarker profiling predicts lethal sensitivity to DCPS inhibition in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic syndrome.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Decoding the archipelago: single-cell biomarkers rechart the molecular geography of acute myeloid leukemia.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- Defining the role of natural killer cells in acute myeloid leukemia through the lens of single-cell omics.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematologic malignancy characterized by aggressive proliferation and chemoresistance, leading to poor patient outcomes. Despite advances in chemotherapy, resistance mechanisms remain inadequately understood, particularly at the cellular and molecular level.
objectivesThis study aims to elucidate the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying drug resistance in AML cells.
methodsA multi-omics approach was employed, integrating single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), chromatin accessibility profiling (scATAC-seq), DNA methylation analysis, and whole-exome sequencing (WES). AML cell lines (KG-1a, Kasumi-1, and HL-60) were treated with standard chemotherapeutic agents, including cytarabine (Ara-C), daunorubicin (DNR), azacitidine (AZA), and decitabine (DEC). Additionally, we developed a novel multiplexed scRNA-seq strategy, NAMUL-seq, to enhance the efficiency and scalability of single-cell transcriptomic research.
resultsWe observed substantial cellular heterogeneity and dynamic transcriptomic trajectories in AML cells subjected to various treatments, uncovering a tendency for reprogramming towards a more stem-like state. Notably, Ara-C-resistant KG-1a cells predominantly originated from G2/M phase subpopulations, suggesting a resistance mechanism linked to specific cell cycle stages. Our findings further indicate that rapid Ara-C resistance is primarily driven by epigenomic changes, including alterations in DNA methylation, chromatin architecture, and transcription factor activity, whereas exonic mutations played a minimal role.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that AML drug resistance is predominantly driven by epigenomic mechanisms rather than genetic mutations. This study provides a detailed cellular and molecular characterization of AML drug response and resistance, identifying potential therapeutic targets and laying the groundwork for future efforts to overcome chemoresistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.