ReviewTransplantation and cellular therapy2025
NIH Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease Consensus Conference 2025 Update.
Review in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting CD162 for Life-Threatening Cutaneous Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease: A Case Report.EJHaem · 2026Article
- Article
- Advances in Cell Therapy for Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: Prophylactic and Therapeutic Perspectives.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- [First-line treatment for chronic graft-versus-host disease: a real-world study].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In 2020, the third NIH Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Clinical Trials was held with the goals of identifying gaps in understanding, prevention and treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and making actionable recommendations that would advance the field. An interim meeting was held in October 2024 to review progress on the 2020 recommendations. Each group was charged with reviewing their previous recommendations, assessing whether the field is on track to eventually achieve the goals, and considering whether recommendations should be modified in light of new data or insufficient progress. This manuscript summarizes the Working Groups' reports and helps define the research agenda for future studies in chronic GVHD. Overall, modest progress has been made on most initiatives. Some studies in progress will address key recommendations and results are eagerly anticipated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.