ArticleScientific reports2025
An investigation into the acceptance of intelligent care systems: an extended technology acceptance model (TAM).
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding consumers' adoption of new energy vehicles in the transition to sustainable transportation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An innovative data mining-driven optimisation modelling approach based on TAM for the design of elderly-centric ICT products.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Conditional acceptance of emotion-recognition-enabled smart care devices for home-based rehabilitation and elderly care: a dual-perspective survey of prospective users and family caregivers.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Bridging the human-AI gap: the role of perceived teacher support in shaping EFL learners' willingness to engage in collaborative writing.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Preferences for assistive healthcare technology by older Chinese adults: A discrete choice experiment.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the aging population trend becoming increasingly pronounced, the health issues of elderly individuals living alone have become a focal point of societal concern. This study aims to investigate guardians of the elderly's acceptance of intelligent care systems for the elderly. This system integrates millimeter-wave radar and image recognition technologies to monitor the health status of seniors in real time and automatically alert their children in emergency situations. To evaluate the market acceptance of this emerging technology, we employed a Covariance-Based Structural Equation Modeling (CB-SEM) approach and constructed an acceptance model for the intelligent care system. Survey data were collected from 386 respondents in China. The results indicate that users of this system are more concerned with task completion rather than ease of use. Enhancements in information trust significantly promote perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEOU), and behavioral intention to use (BI). Individuals with higher risk perception sensitivity exhibit greater perceptions of the system's usefulness and ease of use. Aesthetics emerged as a significant factor influencing PU, PEOU, and BI, second only to information trust. When the system is perceived as well-designed, it is also deemed acceptable. An aesthetically pleasing system is not only considered useful but also easier to use. Interestingly, opinions from social circles did not directly impact BI or PEOU. they only influenced perceived usefulness. Moreover, higher privacy security requirements correlate with lower perceptions of the system's usefulness. Overall, improvements in perceived usefulness, information trust, and aesthetics significantly enhance user acceptance of the system. These findings provide theoretical support for developing more appealing intelligent care systems for the elderly and contribute new perspectives on understanding the key factors driving the adoption of such systems. Additionally, they enrich and refine the knowledge base within the TAM framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.