ArticleScientific reports2025
Changes and risk factors of adult prediabetes, diabetes prevalence and diabetes control among adult residents in Xinjiang from 2010 to 2018.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association between estimated pulse wave velocity and impaired fasting glucose: a multicenter retrospective cohort study in China.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To analyze the status and related risk factors of prediabetes, diabetes and diabetes control among adult residents in Xinjiang, so as to provide basis and guidance for local diabetes prevention and treatment. A multi-stage stratified sampling method was adopted to conduct preliminary screening of all residents aged 18 years old and above. Personal characteristics, blood glucose, hypertension and blood fat were collected by questionnaire survey, physical measurements and laboratory examinations respectively, and the risk factors of prediabetes, diabetes and blood glucose control were analyzed by binary logistic regression model. The prevalence of prediabetes and diabetes and the control rates of blood glucose in 2010 and 2018 were 17.47% and 20.13%, 12.27% and 15.43%, 35.05% and 38.82%, respectively. The increasing trend was found in prevalence of prediabetes and diabetes. Old age, marriage (including cohabitation), divorce (including separation), overweight or obesity, central obseity and dyslipidemia were risk factors in prediabetes, diabetes was related to old age, family history of diabetes, overweight and obesity, central obesity, hypertension and dyslipidemia, and diabetes blood glucose control was influenced by age, region, central obesity and dyslipidemia. Compared with 2010, the adverse effects on prediabetes of gender and diabetes of region were not significant, and the problem of impaired blood glucose caused by harmful drinking behavior was also alleviated. The prevalence of prediabetes and diabetes in Xinjiang residents is still at a high level, and the control of blood glucose needs to be further strengthened. Meanwhile, the elderly, region, married or divorced, family history of diabetes, overweight and obesity, central obesity, hypertension and dyslipidemia are the key groups for prevention and treatment of diabetes in this area. Active control of weight, blood pressure and blood lipids, screening and publicity of prediabetes and diabetes, and regular monitoring and early intervention are of great significance to reduce the incidence and adverse outcomes of diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.