ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of a multi-omics hemorrhagic transformation model based on hyperattenuated imaging markers following mechanical thrombectomy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a predictive model integrating clinical, radiomics, and deep learning (DL) features of hyperattenuated imaging markers (HIM) from computed tomography scans immediately following mechanical thrombectomy (MT) to predict hemorrhagic transformation (HT). A total of 239 patients with HIM who underwent MT were enrolled, with 191 patients (80%) in the training cohort and 48 patients (20%) in the validation cohort. Additionally, the model was tested on an internal prospective cohort of 49 patients. A total of 1834 radiomics features and 2048 DL features were extracted from HIM images. Statistical methods, such as analysis of variance, Pearson's correlation coefficient, principal component analysis, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, were used to select the most significant features. A K-Nearest Neighbor classifier was employed to develop a combined model integrating clinical, radiomics, and DL features for HT prediction. Model performance was evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic curves, and area under curve (AUC). In the training, validation, and test cohorts, the combined model achieved AUCs of 0.926, 0.923, and 0.887, respectively, outperforming other models, including clinical, radiomics, and DL models, as well as hybrid models combining subsets of features (Clinical + Radiomics, DL + Radiomics, and Clinical + DL) in predicting HT. The combined model, which integrates clinical, radiomics, and DL features derived from HIM, demonstrated efficacy in noninvasively predicting HT. These findings suggest its potential utility in guiding clinical decision-making for patients with MT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.