ArticleScientific reports2025
Automated depression detection via cloud based EEG analysis with transfer learning and synchrosqueezed wavelet transform.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- FSC-BiMamba: A Dual-Branch Bidirectional Mamba Network for Frontal Sparse-Channel EEG Depression Detection.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Depression Detection from Three-Channel Resting-State EEG Using a Hybrid Conv1D and Spectral-Statistical Fusion Model.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Predicting Major Depressive Disorder Using Neural Networks from Spectral Measures of EEG Data.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-COVID-19, depression rates have risen sharply, increasing the need for early diagnosis using electroencephalogram (EEG) and deep learning. To tackle this, we developed a cloud-based computer-aided depression diagnostic (CCADD) system that utilizes EEG signals from local databases. This system was optimized through a series of experiments to identify the most accurate model. The experiments employed a pre-trained convolutional neural network, ResNet18, fine-tuned on time-frequency synchrosqueezed wavelet transform (SSWT) images derived from EEG signals. Various data augmentation methods, including image processing techniques and noises, were applied to identify the best model for CCADD. To offer this device with minimal electrodes, we aimed to balance high accuracy with fewer electrodes. Two publicly databases were evaluated using this approach. Dataset I included 31 individuals detected with major depressive disorder and a control class of 27 age-matched healthy subjects. Dataset II comprised 90 participants, with 45 diagnosed with depression and 45 healthy controls. The leave-subjects-out cross-validation method with 20 subjects was used to validate the proposed method. The highest average accuracies for the selected model are 98%, 97%, 91%, and 88% for the parietal and central lobes in Databases I and II, respectively. The corresponding highest f-scores are 96.27%, 94.87%, 90.56%, and 89.65%. The highest intra-database accuracy and F1-score are 75.10% and 73.56% when training with SSWT images from Database II and testing with parietal images from Database I. This study introduces a novel cloud-based model for depression detection, paving the way for effective diagnostic tools and potentially revolutionizing depression management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.