ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Prophylactic administration of tirofiban prevents ischemic events in endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStents-assisted coiling (SAC) and flow diverters (FD) are widely used in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. However, due to the thrombogenicity of metallic implants, their application may increase the risk of ischemic events. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic tirofiban with dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) in unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) patients treated with SAC or FD.
methodsThis single center retrospective study included patients with UIAs treated with SAC or FD. Data collected included demographic information, imaging findings, laboratory results, and perioperative complications. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for ischemic events. Patients were stratified based on these risk factors, and the efficacy of tirofiban was evaluated across different risk groups.
resultsA total of 420 patients were included in the study, of whom 22(5.2%) experienced ischemic events. Among them, eight patients (3.3%) were in the tirofiban group and 14 patients (8.0%) were in the DAPT (non-tirofiban) group. Multivariate logistic regression identified independent risk factors for ischemic events, including posterior circulation aneurysm (OR: 2.87, 95% CI: 1.06-7.78; P = 0.038) and diabetes (OR: 4.05, 95% CI: 1.50-10.96; P = 0.006). The prophylactic use of tirofiban combined with DAPT can effectively reduce postoperative ischemic events (OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.14-0.91; P = 0.032) without increasing the risk of hemorrhage.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that prophylactic use of tirofiban can effectively reduce postoperative ischemic events in UIA patients receiving SAC or FD treatments without increasing the risk of hemorrhage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40410393What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.