ArticleScientific reports2025
Application of machine learning algorithm for prediction of abortion among reproductive age women in Ethiopia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of machine learning algorithms for prediction of abortion and its determinants among women of reproductive-age in East African countries.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Machine learning based classification of female genital mutilation in 11 Sub-Saharan African countries using demographic and health survey data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Geospatial variation and machine learning approaches to predict open defecation practice in Zambia.PloS one · 2026Article
- Machine learning predicts diabetes risk in high-risk populations: analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abortion is a critical health issue that leads to numerous complications, maternal deaths, and significant financial burdens on women, families, and healthcare systems. Studies have identified factors associated with abortion using traditional statistical analysis methods; however, no previous research has utilized machine learning to predict abortion in Ethiopia or identify its predictive factors. Machine learning is more effective and offers a better solution as it can capture complex and non-linear relationships in the data, leading to improved prediction accuracy compared to traditional regression models. Therefore, this study employed machine learning algorithms to predict abortion in Ethiopia and identify its predictors using nationally representative data. This study used the recent 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey and included a sample of 14,931 women of reproductive age (15-49 years). This study used 7 machine learning algorithms for the classification of abortion. The dataset was randomly split into training and testing sets, with 80% allocated for training and 20% for testing. To evaluate the performance of each predictive model, we used a range of metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the curve (AUC). In this study, SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) values were used to measure the influence of each feature on the model's predictions. In the current study, 7 machine learning algorithm (i.e. logistic regression, decision tree classifier, random forest classifier, support vector machine, K neighbor classifier, XGBoost, and Nave bayes) were applied. The random forest classifier model were the best predictive models with the accuracy of 0.91 and AUC of 0.97. Moreover, the XGBoost was the 2nd best-performing algorithm with 0.87 accuracy and 0.94 AUC. According to the SHAP beeswarm and bar plots, younger age was identified as the strongest predictor of abortion, with a mean SHAP value of + 0.060. The second most impactful factor was having a younger husband, contributing a mean SHAP value of + 0.050 to abortion prediction in Ethiopia. Additionally, giving birth for the first time before the age of 18 ranked third, with a mean SHAP value of + 0.052. This study underscores the value of integrating machine learning into public health research and practice. Future work should focus on refining these models with larger and more diverse datasets, as well as exploring their applicability in other contexts and regions to further global maternal health initiatives. By harnessing machine learning techniques, healthcare providers can better classify abortion risks in reproductive-age women in Ethiopia. This knowledge can inform targeted interventions, enhance reproductive health services, and ultimately improve maternal health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.