Evidence mapPaperPMID 40410682Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2025

Community-based interventions to detect visual impairment in community-dwelling older adults aged ≥ 75 years: a systematic review.

Andrea Nedergaard Jensen, Birte Bay Højsted, Victoria Eichel, Mie Klarskov Jensen, Torben Lykke Sørensen, Maria Kristiansen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea Nedergaard JensenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zealand University Hospital, Vestermarksvej 23, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark. anneje@regionsjaelland.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4801-8202
Birte Bay HøjstedDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zealand University Hospital, Vestermarksvej 23, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6949-4008
Victoria EichelDepartment of Natural Sciences, Scripps College, Claremont, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-7398-6324
Mie Klarskov JensenDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6182-7079
Torben Lykke SørensenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zealand University Hospital, Vestermarksvej 23, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6790-0199
Maria KristiansenDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2319-3637

Funding

Interreg Öresund-Kattegat-Skagerak 20358631The EGV Foundation 1491The Nordea-Foundation 02-2013-0200The Region of Zealand's Health Research Foundation R41-A1821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, 2.2 billion individuals live with visual impairment (VI). However, many cases remain undetected, particularly among older adults. Therefore, novel interventions for detection are needed. Community-based interventions (CBIs) that target people where they live provide a promising approach. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the existing literature describing potentials and barriers regarding uptake, feasibility, and effects of CBIs in detecting VI among community-dwelling older adults aged ≥ 75 years.

methodsWe conducted a mixed methods systematic literature review. PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for articles with no restrictions on publication date. Studies were eligible if they reported on a CBI to detect VI among older adults aged ≥ 75 years. Two reviewers independently extracted data and appraised the quality and risk of bias of the included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A narrative meta-synthesis of the relevant evidence was conducted.

resultsWe identified 3,019 articles of which 26 of varying methodological quality were included. The VI detection methods included surveys, optometric tests, eye examinations, and self-reported visual status. Potentials and barriers regarding the uptake, feasibility, and effects of the interventions were identified at the individual, interpersonal, and community and system levels. Key potentials that may lead to successful interventions included leveraging community resources, tailoring of interventions, targeting underserved populations, high participant satisfaction, increased accessibility, and the use of tele-ophthalmology technology. Conversely, barriers that may negatively affect intervention uptake, feasibility, and effectiveness included financial constraints, poor general health, lack of eye-health awareness, poor referral systems, lack of institutional resources or access to detection technology, and technological challenges.

conclusionThe synthesized results emphasize the importance of developing CBIs that target multiple levels, including the individual, interpersonal, community and system levels. Our results indicate that this may involve combining components such as eye health education, targeted strategies, use of appropriate detection methodologies, and ensuring affordability. These results may inform the development of novel CBIs to foster more effective detection of VI among older populations, improve community eye health, and reduce the burden of VI.

trial registrationCRD42023468155.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesIndependent LivingVision DisordersAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleAccess to eye careCommunity-basedDetectionElderlyEye diseaseOlder adultsUnderserved populationVisual impairment

Identifiers

PMID40410682
PMCPMC12100918

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.