Evidence mapPaperPMID 40410749Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Perceptions of cancer risk communication in individuals with overweight or obesity- a qualitative interview study.

Åsa Grauman, Erica Sundell, Jessica Nihlén Fahlquist, Mariann Hedström

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Åsa GraumanCentre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22, Sweden. asa.grauman@uu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7293-3411
Erica SundellCentre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22, Sweden.
Jessica Nihlén FahlquistCentre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22, Sweden.
Mariann HedströmDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAddressing obesity and overweight is crucial for cancer prevention. However, ensuring that such efforts do not harm individuals with obesity requires careful consideration to avoid reinforcing the widespread stigmatisation of individuals with obesity. This study aims to explore how individuals who have overweight or obesity perceive cancer risk information addressing obesity as a cancer risk factor.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted during autumn 2023 and spring 2024, with 11 Swedish men and women, aged 24 to 70 years, who self-assessed as having overweight or obesity. The collected data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis as described by Braun and Clarke.

resultsThe first theme, Reflecting on personal risk, included the subthemes: It is about me and my body and Awareness can be a burden. The second theme, Healthcare encounters: building trust and providing support, included the subthemes: Past encounters influence how risk information is perceived, Need to act and succeed, and Consider receptivity and power imbalances. The third theme, Distribution of responsibility and blameworthiness, included subthemes: Being personally blamed and fearing increased discrimination and A need for shared responsibility.

conclusionParticipants experienced that risk information, when presented as simplified associations between obesity and cancer, felt personally relevant but difficult to act upon, and therefore burdensome to bear. Consequently, the information risks failing to prevent cancer and may instead cause harm to the people it purports to benefit. Participants suggested several ways to improve the provision and benefit of such information, including introducing multiple ways to act to reduce cancer risk that goes beyond weight reduction, and raising public awareness of the causes of obesity. Efforts to communicate risk, both to the public and to patients, require better ethical considerations of their benefits and harms. Furthermore, risk communicators should act with compassion and responsibility.

Indexed as

CommunicationNeoplasmsObesityOverweightAdultAgedFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSwedenYoung AdultCancerObesityOverweightPreventionQualitative research, stigmaRisk communication

Identifiers

PMID40410749
PMCPMC12101019

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.