ArticleBMC public health2025
Quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia related short videos on mainstream platforms: cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Content quality and reliability of mental health videos for cancer patients on social media platforms: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Quality assessment of ADHD-related short videos on Chinese social media: A cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Analysis of the content, quality, and reliability of sarcopenia-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili: A cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- The quality and reliability of short videos about chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-sectional study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- A cross-sectional study assessing the reliability and quality of educational videos on hydrocephalus available on TikTok and Bilibili.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Quality and content evaluation of male HPV infection on Bilibili and TikTok: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Linking Perceived Hospital-Generated Content to Psychological Well-Being Through Integrated Cognitive and Emotional Resilience Mechanisms Among Emerging Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- The quality and reliability of short videos about choledocholithiasis on TikTok and Bilibili in China.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of vascular cognitive impairment-related information on Chinese social media platforms.Medicine · 2026Article
- The quality of video information related to smoking cessation on mainstream short-video platforms in China: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Quality and dissemination of nasopharyngeal cancer health information on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Quality and guideline concordance of neonatal jaundice information on short-video platforms: implications for parental education and newborn safety.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of femoral neck fracture educational short videos: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The quality and reliability of Kawasaki disease-related short videos on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-platform content analysis using GQS, mDISCERN, and JAMA benchmarks.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- The quality and reliability of short videos about pulmonary hypertension on Bilibili and TikTok: a cross-sectional study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Do likes reflect quality? Engagement metrics and information reliability of robotic surgery short videos.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- A cross-sectional analysis of the quality and characteristics of sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome videos on YouTube, Bilibili, and TikTok.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of sarcopenia-related videos on BiliBili and TikTok: a cross-sectional content analysis study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Short-form video platforms as a source of ankylosing spondylitis information: a cross-sectional content analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPediatric pneumonia remains a major global health concern, accounting for one of the leading causes of mortality among children under five years of age. With the prevalence of COVID-19, public attention to pediatric pneumonia has significantly increased. In recent years, short video platforms such as Bilibili, TikTok, and Kwai-boasting billions of global users-have emerged as critical channels for disseminating and accessing health-related information. This study systematically evaluates the quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia-related short videos on the aforementioned three platforms.
methodsWe employed the Chinese keyword "Pneumonia in Children" to conduct searches on Bilibili, TikTok, and Kwai, selected the top 100 recommended related videos of each platform, and extracted and recorded the title, website, publisher, content, duration, days since published, and audience engagement metrics (Likes, Comments, Saves) of each video. The Global Quality Scale (GQS), modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), and Medical Quality Video Evaluation Tool (MQ-VET) were used to evaluate video quality and reliability. Finally, statistical analyses were conducted to compare quality differences among different platforms, different types of publishers, and different video content.
resultsSignificant variations in audience engagement metrics (likes, comments, and saves) were observed across the three platforms (p < 0.01), with TikTok demonstrating the highest values for all metrics. The categorization of video content and publisher types exhibited statistically significant heterogeneity among the platforms (p < 0.001). Videos created by medical professionals exhibited significantly elevated quality and reliability assessment scores in comparison to content generated by non-medical practitioners (p < 0.001). Bilibili consistently achieved the highest scores across all evaluation tools (GQS, mDISCERN, and MQ-VET scores; p < 0.001), particularly for content produced by medical professionals. Compared with News and reports, videos focused on disease Disease knowledge and Treatment and prevention received significantly higher scores (p < 0.001). Notably, a negative correlation was identified between video quality scores and audience engagement metrics(p < 0.05).
conclusionThe overall quality of video content on the three platforms Bilibili, TikTok, and Kwai is average, with low reliability, among which Bilibili's video quality and reliability are higher than the other two platforms. Meanwhile, videos published by medical professionals have better quality and higher reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.