Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40410758›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia related short videos on mainstream platforms: cross-sectional study.

Fengqi He, Mei Yang, Jun Liu, Ting Gong, Jinhua Ma, Tian Yang, Dandong Zhao, Shaunglian Li, Daiyin Tian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Content quality and reliability of mental health videos for cancer patients on social media platforms: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fengqi He *Department of Respiratory of Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, No. 20, Jinyu Avenue, Liangjiang New District, Chongqing, 401122, China.
Mei Yang *Department of Respiratory of Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, No. 20, Jinyu Avenue, Liangjiang New District, Chongqing, 401122, China.
Jun Liu *Chongqing Shapingba Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Ting GongDepartment of Respiratory of Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, No. 20, Jinyu Avenue, Liangjiang New District, Chongqing, 401122, China.
Jinhua MaDepartment of Respiratory of Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, No. 20, Jinyu Avenue, Liangjiang New District, Chongqing, 401122, China.
Tian YangDepartment of Respiratory of Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, No. 20, Jinyu Avenue, Liangjiang New District, Chongqing, 401122, China.
Dandong ZhaoDepartment of Respiratory of Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, No. 20, Jinyu Avenue, Liangjiang New District, Chongqing, 401122, China.
Shaunglian LiDepartment of Respiratory of Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, No. 20, Jinyu Avenue, Liangjiang New District, Chongqing, 401122, China.
Daiyin TianDepartment of Respiratory of Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, No. 20, Jinyu Avenue, Liangjiang New District, Chongqing, 401122, China. t_dy@163.com.

Funding

CQMU Program for Youth Innovation in Future Medicine W0063Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China CSTB2022NSCQ-MSX0822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPediatric pneumonia remains a major global health concern, accounting for one of the leading causes of mortality among children under five years of age. With the prevalence of COVID-19, public attention to pediatric pneumonia has significantly increased. In recent years, short video platforms such as Bilibili, TikTok, and Kwai-boasting billions of global users-have emerged as critical channels for disseminating and accessing health-related information. This study systematically evaluates the quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia-related short videos on the aforementioned three platforms.

methodsWe employed the Chinese keyword "Pneumonia in Children" to conduct searches on Bilibili, TikTok, and Kwai, selected the top 100 recommended related videos of each platform, and extracted and recorded the title, website, publisher, content, duration, days since published, and audience engagement metrics (Likes, Comments, Saves) of each video. The Global Quality Scale (GQS), modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), and Medical Quality Video Evaluation Tool (MQ-VET) were used to evaluate video quality and reliability. Finally, statistical analyses were conducted to compare quality differences among different platforms, different types of publishers, and different video content.

resultsSignificant variations in audience engagement metrics (likes, comments, and saves) were observed across the three platforms (p < 0.01), with TikTok demonstrating the highest values for all metrics. The categorization of video content and publisher types exhibited statistically significant heterogeneity among the platforms (p < 0.001). Videos created by medical professionals exhibited significantly elevated quality and reliability assessment scores in comparison to content generated by non-medical practitioners (p < 0.001). Bilibili consistently achieved the highest scores across all evaluation tools (GQS, mDISCERN, and MQ-VET scores; p < 0.001), particularly for content produced by medical professionals. Compared with News and reports, videos focused on disease Disease knowledge and Treatment and prevention received significantly higher scores (p < 0.001). Notably, a negative correlation was identified between video quality scores and audience engagement metrics(p < 0.05).

conclusionThe overall quality of video content on the three platforms Bilibili, TikTok, and Kwai is average, with low reliability, among which Bilibili's video quality and reliability are higher than the other two platforms. Meanwhile, videos published by medical professionals have better quality and higher reliability.

Indexed as

Information DisseminationPneumoniaVideo RecordingChildChild, PreschoolCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesHumansReproducibility of ResultsBilibiliCross-sectional studyKwaiPediatric pneumoniaQuality and reliabilityShort videosTiktok

Identifiers

PMID40410758
PMCPMC12101000

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.